These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15641900)

  • 1. When does feedback facilitate learning of words?
    Pashler H; Cepeda NJ; Wixted JT; Rohrer D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 15641900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates?
    Pashler H; Zarow G; Triplett B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1051-7. PubMed ID: 14622045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word learning can be achieved without feedback: implications for aphasia therapy.
    Breitenstein C; Kamping S; Jansen A; Schomacher M; Knecht S
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):445-58. PubMed ID: 15798363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 18605878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five days versus a lifetime: intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words.
    Breitenstein C; Zwitserlood P; de Vries MH; Feldhues C; Knecht S; Dobel C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(5-6):493-500. PubMed ID: 18334767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The critical importance of retrieval for learning.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):966-8. PubMed ID: 18276894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test.
    Marsh EJ; Lozito JP; Umanath S; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Memory; 2012; 20(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 22640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedback in distance education.
    Hudspeth D
    Dev Commun Rep; 1988; (63):12-3. PubMed ID: 12315710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do errors matter? Errorless and errorful learning in anomic picture naming.
    McKissock S; Ward J
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 17(3):355-73. PubMed ID: 17474061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of discourse context in developing word form representations: a paradoxical relation between reading and learning.
    Landi N; Perfetti CA; Bolger DJ; Dunlap S; Foorman BR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):114-33. PubMed ID: 16600285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contributions of online visual feedback to the learning and generalization of novel finger coordination patterns.
    Liu X; Scheidt RA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2546-57. PubMed ID: 18353914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of different reinforcement conditions on the test performance of multihandicapped deaf children.
    Smeets PM; Striefel S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 124721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance feedback drives caudate activation in a phonological learning task.
    Tricomi E; Delgado MR; McCandliss BD; McClelland JL; Fiez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):1029-43. PubMed ID: 16839308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of manual guidance and knowledge of results in the learning of a weight-bearing skill.
    Sidaway B; Ahn S; Boldeau P; Griffin S; Noyes B; Pelletier K
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2008 Mar; 32(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 18463553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech.
    Austermann Hula SN; Robin DA; Maas E; Ballard KJ; Schmidt RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1088-113. PubMed ID: 18728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.