132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15641976)
1. Fracture resistance of class II packable composite restorations with and without flowable liners.
Ozgünaltay G; Görücü J
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15641976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites.
Attar N; Turgut MD; Güngör HC
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15088727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
de Souza FB; Guimarães RP; Silva CH
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Hernandez PA; Macedo RP; Busato AL
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
Qin M; Liu H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The leakage of Class II cavities restored with packable resin-based composites.
Bala O; Uçtasli MB; Unlü I
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):1-11. PubMed ID: 14625591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations.
Loguercio AD; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Reis A; Grande RH
Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14765638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
