287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15642421)
21. Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy: results from the Nurses' Health Study.
Collins LC; Tamimi RM; Baer HJ; Connolly JL; Colditz GA; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1778-84. PubMed ID: 15770688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histologic sections.
Tot T
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2551-60. PubMed ID: 17932896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An epidemiologic study of differences between mammary ductal and lobular carcinoma in situ: analysis of 11,436 cases from the California Cancer Registry.
Saltzstein SL
Anat Pathol; 1996; 1():193-203. PubMed ID: 9390929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Barth A; Brenner RJ; Giuliano AE
West J Med; 1995 Oct; 163(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 7483593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [In situ carcinomas of the breast: clinical features and therapeutic strategies].
Attene F; Scognamillo F; Trignano E; Meloni GB; Rubino C; Trignano M
Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):3-10; discussion 10-2. PubMed ID: 16910353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Carcinoma within solitary ductal papilloma of the breast.
Greif F; Sharon E; Shechtman I; Morgenstern S; Gutman H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 19646841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Familial breast carcinoma risks by morphology: a nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden.
Hemminki K; Granström C
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(11):3063-70. PubMed ID: 12115398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incidental Findings in Reduction Mammoplasty Specimens in Patients with No Prior History of Breast Cancer. An Analysis of 783 Specimens.
Usón Junior PLS; Callegaro Filho D; Bugano DDG; Geyer FC; de Nigro Corpa MV; Gonçalves PDS; Simon SD; Kaliks RA
Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 28391513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: terminal duct lobular units in the nipple.
Stolier AJ; Wang J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):438-42. PubMed ID: 18004629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Symmetrization reduction mammaplasty combined with sentinel node biopsy in patients operated for contralateral breast cancer.
Schrenk P; Wölfl S; Bogner S; Huemer GM; Wayand W
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jul; 94(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16788937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.
Li CI; Malone KE; Saltzman BS; Daling JR
Cancer; 2006 May; 106(10):2104-12. PubMed ID: 16604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tuttle TM; Jarosek S; Habermann EB; Arrington A; Abraham A; Morris TJ; Virnig BA
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1362-7. PubMed ID: 19224844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG; O'Dell CA; Brekke CE
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18436185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast].
Rueda Domínguez A; Alonso Muñoz MC; Gómez Gómez A; Ojeda González B
Med Clin (Barc); 1993 Oct; 101(14):548-56. PubMed ID: 8231402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Changing incidence rate of invasive lobular breast carcinoma among older women.
Li CI; Anderson BO; Porter P; Holt SK; Daling JR; Moe RE
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 88(11):2561-9. PubMed ID: 10861434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk for contralateral breast cancers in a population covered by mammography: effects of family history, age at diagnosis and histology.
Ji J; Hemminki K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Oct; 105(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 17115107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data.
Chuba PJ; Hamre MR; Yap J; Severson RK; Lucas D; Shamsa F; Aref A
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(24):5534-41. PubMed ID: 16110014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; Fonseca A; Crystal P; Escallon J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():273-9. PubMed ID: 20853046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
