482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15642490)
1. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
Kamei N; Yamane K; Nakanishi S; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Ohshita K; Watanabe H; Fujikawa R; Okubo M; Kohno N
J Diabetes Complications; 2005; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibration perception threshold: are multiple sites of testing superior to single site testing on diabetic foot examination?
Armstrong DG; Hussain SK; Middleton J; Peters EJ; Wunderlich RP; Lavery LA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 May; 44(5):70-4, 76. PubMed ID: 9697548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Feng Y; Schlösser FJ; Sumpio BE
J Vasc Surg; 2009 Sep; 50(3):675-82, 682.e1. PubMed ID: 19595541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolated use of vibration perception thresholds and semmes-weinstein monofilament in diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy: "the North Catalonia diabetes study".
Jurado J; Ybarra J; Pou JM
Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Mar; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 17270590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Easier operation and similar power of 10 g monofilament test for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Zhang Q; Yi N; Liu S; Zheng H; Qiao X; Xiong Q; Liu X; Zhang S; Wen J; Ye H; Zhou L; Li Y; Hu R; Lu B
J Int Med Res; 2018 Aug; 46(8):3278-3284. PubMed ID: 29808737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostaglandin E1 in lipid microspheres ameliorates diabetic peripheral neuropathy: clinical usefulness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for evaluating diabetic sensory abnormality.
Akahori H; Takamura T; Hayakawa T; Ando H; Yamashita H; Kobayashi K
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2004 Jun; 64(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 15126001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the four simple methods in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy].
Jia WP; Shen Q; Bao YQ; Lu JX; Li M; Xiang KS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 86(38):2707-10. PubMed ID: 17199983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy determined by a 12 year prospective study using vibration perception thresholds.
Coppini DV; Wellmer A; Weng C; Young PJ; Anand P; Sönksen PH
J Clin Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 8(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 11683597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Examination of peripheral sensibility. Vibration test is more sensitive than monofilament test].
Sörman E; Edwall LL
Lakartidningen; 2002 Mar; 99(12):1339-40. PubMed ID: 11998167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Jayaprakash P; Bhansali A; Bhansali S; Dutta P; Anantharaman R; Shanmugasundar G; Ravikiran M
Indian J Med Res; 2011 Jun; 133(6):645-9. PubMed ID: 21727664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK
Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic.
Perkins BA; Olaleye D; Zinman B; Bril V
Diabetes Care; 2001 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 11213874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients without diabetic foot problems.
Nather A; Neo SH; Chionh SB; Liew SC; Sim EY; Chew JL
J Diabetes Complications; 2008; 22(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 18280443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prevalence of symptoms of sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathy in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic subjects.
Kästenbauer T; Irsigler P; Sauseng S; Grimm A; Prager R
J Diabetes Complications; 2004; 18(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 15019596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does anodyne light therapy improve peripheral neuropathy in diabetes? A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate monochromatic infrared photoenergy.
Lavery LA; Murdoch DP; Williams J; Lavery DC
Diabetes Care; 2008 Feb; 31(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 17977931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the new indicator test for sudomotor function (Neuropad) with the vibration perception threshold and the clinical examination in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Papanas N; Papatheodorou K; Papazoglou D; Monastiriotis C; Christakidis D; Maltezos E
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2008 Feb; 116(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 18095233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
May JD; Morris MWJ
Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(4):281-284. PubMed ID: 29202988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.
Oyer DS; Saxon D; Shah A
Endocr Pract; 2007; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An initial evaluation of a proof-of-concept 128-Hz electronic tuning fork in the detection of peripheral neuropathy.
O'Brien T; Karem J
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24725032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
