BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15643242)

  • 21. [Vasovasostomy in previously sterilized men. The functional result].
    Aabech J; Hansen HJ; Vibits H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Sep; 156(37):5297-300. PubMed ID: 7941070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: a systematic review.
    Elzanaty S; Dohle GR
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Aug; 46(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 22452615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations.
    Matthews GJ; Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2070-3. PubMed ID: 7500460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vasovasostomy: kinetics and predictors of patency.
    Farber NJ; Flannigan R; Srivastava A; Wang H; Goldstein M
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Apr; 113(4):774-780.e3. PubMed ID: 32228879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Obstructive azoospermia treated by epididymovasostomy following vasovasostomy: a case report].
    Matsuda T; Nonomura M; Shichiri Y; Nishimura K; Hida S; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 May; 34(5):889-91. PubMed ID: 3177130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical application of cross microsurgical vasovasostomy in scrotum for atypical obstructive azoospermia.
    Liang ZY; Zhang FB; Li LJ; Li JP; Wu JG; Chen C; Zhu YM
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Mar.; 20(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 30829015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal.
    Boorjian S; Lipkin M; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):304-6. PubMed ID: 14665900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Need for sperm retrieval and cryopreservation at vasectomy reversal.
    Schrepferman CG; Carson MR; Sparks AE; Sandlow JI
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1787-9. PubMed ID: 11586225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of obstructive interval, presence of sperm granulomas and patient age as predictors of spermatogenesis in a cohort of men undergoing vasectomy reversal].
    Magheli A; Schulze W; Weiske WH; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Hinz S
    Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19941266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intravasal "toothpaste" in men with obstructive azoospermia is derived from vasal epithelium, not sperm.
    Anger JT; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):634-6. PubMed ID: 15247749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fertility outcome after repeat vasoepididymostomy.
    Pasqualotto FF; Agarwal A; Srivastava M; Nelson DR; Thomas AJ
    J Urol; 1999 Nov; 162(5):1626-8. PubMed ID: 10524883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two cases of delayed patency following "failed" epididymovasostomy and subsequent percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration.
    van Roijen JH
    Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):5022-5; discussion 5025. PubMed ID: 20156383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Seminal tract obstruction caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of microsurgical reanastomosis.
    Matsuda T; Muguruma K; Hiura Y; Okuno H; Shichiri Y; Yoshida O
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):837-40. PubMed ID: 9474163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unilateral obstruction of the vas deferens diagnosed by seminal vesicle aspiration.
    Seifman BD; Ohl DA; Jarow JP; Menge AC
    Tech Urol; 1999 Jun; 5(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 10458668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Secondary azoospermia after vasovasostomy.
    Kolettis PN; Fretz P; Burns JR; D'amico AM; Box LC; Sandlow JI
    Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):968-71. PubMed ID: 15882733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
    McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New nonabsorbable stent versus a microsurgical procedure for vasectomy reversal: evaluating tissue reactions at the anastomosis in rabbits.
    Vrijhof EJ; de Bruine A; Zwinderman A; Lycklama à Nijeholt AA; Koole L
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16169412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Our experience with simplified vasovasostomy. Review of our results during the last 5 years].
    Ramada Benlloch FJ; de la Torre Abril L; Tramoyeres Galvañ A; Cánovas Ivorra JA; Sánchez Ballester F; Ordoño Domínguez F; Navalón Verdejo P; Zaragoza Orts J
    Arch Esp Urol; 2004; 57(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 15112872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners.
    Chan PT; Goldstein M
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1371-4. PubMed ID: 15136104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
    Tang SX; Zhou HL; Ding YL; Yang P; Chen Q; Chen X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 98(46):3741-3745. PubMed ID: 30541214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.