These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15643411)
1. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 42(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 15544881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 14980594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mandibular distraction during orthodontic treatment]. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Jan; 110(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15004991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion. Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Class II malocclusion. Time and cost of a combined orthodontic and surgical treatment]. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Jul; 111(7):261-5. PubMed ID: 15315104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis for severe telescopic bite correction: a report of 2 cases. Azumi Y; Sugawara J; Nagasaka H; Kawamura H World J Orthod; 2007; 8(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17902327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better? Ow AT; Cheung LK Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review. Ow A; Cheung LK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Schreuder WH; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis. Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study. Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]