These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15643948)

  • 1. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
    Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).
    Rudolfsen G; Figenschou L; Folstad I; Nordeide JT; Søreng E
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 15669974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
    Wong BB; Candolin U
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 Nov; 80(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 16221329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits and the maintenance of genetic diversity in song sparrows.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19032502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Agbali M; Reichard M; Bryjová A; Bryja J; Smith C
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1683-96. PubMed ID: 20148959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good genes drive female choice for mating partners in the lek-breeding European treefrog.
    Jaquiéry J; Broquet T; Aguilar C; Evanno G; Perrin N
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19674094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.
    Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2010 May; 175(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20331359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes?
    Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Hadfield JD; Tregenza T
    Genetica; 2008 Mar; 132(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17647083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis.
    Slatyer RA; Mautz BS; Backwell PR; Jennions MD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 21545390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection and mate choice.
    Andersson M; Simmons LW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jun; 21(6):296-302. PubMed ID: 16769428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana.
    Dziminski MA; Roberts JD; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):879-86. PubMed ID: 18208566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.