455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15644756)
1. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.
Zheng Z; Luk KD; Kuang G; Li Z; Lin J; Lam WM; Cheung KM; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2076-82. PubMed ID: 17762808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae.
Chen B; Li Y; Xie D; Yang X; Zheng Z
Eur Spine J; 2011 Aug; 20(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 21384203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approach.
Chen C; Wei H; Zhang W; Gu Y; Tang G; Dong R; Xu Y; Chen L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):E62-5. PubMed ID: 21822151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.
Upasani VV; Robertson C; Lee D; Tomlinson T; Mahar AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1783-8. PubMed ID: 20098352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approachment: a comparative study in early stage.
Chen C; Chen L; Gu Y; Xu Y; Liu Y; Bai X; Zhu X; Yang H
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 19818957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty for treating acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the lower lumbar spine: a retrospective study.
Qian Y; Li Y; Shen G; Zhong X; Tang C; He S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 37221523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [CT-based analysis of cement distribution in unipedicular vertebroplasty].
Walz M; Esmer E; Kolbow B
Unfallchirurg; 2006 Nov; 109(11):932-9. PubMed ID: 17066292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiological comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.
Song BK; Eun JP; Oh YM
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1717-23. PubMed ID: 19259608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: a cadaveric study.
Krüger A; Oberkircher L; Figiel J; Floßdorf F; Bolzinger F; Noriega DC; Ruchholtz S
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1092-8. PubMed ID: 24200410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Height restoration and preservation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a biomechanical analysis of standard balloon kyphoplasty versus radiofrequency kyphoplasty in a cadaveric model.
Oberkircher L; Struewer J; Bliemel C; Buecking B; Eschbach DA; Ruchholtz S; Krueger A
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 24077411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis.
Li LH; Sun TS; Liu Z; Zhang JZ; Zhang Y; Cai YH; Wang H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Oct; 126(20):3956-61. PubMed ID: 24157165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized study.
Zhang L; Liu Z; Wang J; Feng X; Yang J; Tao Y; Zhang S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():145. PubMed ID: 26071690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of efficacies of unipedicular kyphoplasty and bipedicular kyphoplasty for treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.
Lee CH; Kim HJ; Lee MK; Kim HS; Choi SS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(38):e22046. PubMed ID: 32957325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: early results.
Papadopoulos EC; Edobor-Osula F; Gardner MJ; Shindle MK; Lane JM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):589-96. PubMed ID: 19057254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of radiological and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty according to anterior height loss in the osteoporotic vertebral fracture.
Lee JH; Lee DO; Lee JH; Lee HS
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2281-9. PubMed ID: 24462536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: biomechanical behavior under repetitive loading conditions.
Kim MJ; Lindsey DP; Hannibal M; Alamin TF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2079-84. PubMed ID: 16915092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
