BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15645160)

  • 1. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
    Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.
    Carver TE; Christou NV; Court O; Lemke H; Andersen RE
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 23896494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of bone mineral density of lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck and Ward's triangle by forearm bone mineral density.
    Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P; Kongkiatikul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Mar; 84(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 11460941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
    Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer.
    Boudousq V; Kotzki PO; Dinten JM; Barrau C; Robert-Coutant C; Thomas E; Goulart DM
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 May; 14(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 12730787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
    Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.
    Ruetsche AG; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Casez JP
    J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10871910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.
    Ozdemir A; Uçar M
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip.
    Franck H; Munz M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Aug; 67(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 10920214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements.
    Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in chinese women.
    Liao EY; Wu XP; Deng XG; Huang G; Zhu XP; Long ZF; Wang WB; Tang WL; Zhang H
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Aug; 13(8):669-76. PubMed ID: 12181627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.
    Hind K; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 20705494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the Stratos, a new pencil-beam bone densitometer: dosimetry, precision, and cross calibration.
    Nalda E; Mahadea KK; Dematteï C; Kotzki PO; Pouget JP; Boudousq V
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 21839660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.
    Blake GM; Herd RJ; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(6):462-70. PubMed ID: 9116392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system.
    Bouyoucef SE; Cullum ID; Ell PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):522-31. PubMed ID: 8757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China.
    Wu XP; Liao EY; Liu SP; Zhang H; Shan PF; Cao XZ; Jiang Y
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Sep; 15(9):751-9. PubMed ID: 15175842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.