These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15646137)

  • 1. [Standardization of control studies in determination of sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs by the disk-diffusion method based on domestic nutrition media].
    Poliak MS; Azanchevskaia SV; Tsvetkova IA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2004 Nov; (11):53-6. PubMed ID: 15646137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standards and errors in determining the sensitivity of bacteria to antimicrobial agents by disk-diffusion method].
    Belokrysenko SS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2003 Aug; (8):49-51. PubMed ID: 14524132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality control for antibiotic sensitivity testing in 2013].
    Veldman K; Heuvelink A; De Leure PT; Mevius D
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2014 Feb; 139(2):36-7, 39. PubMed ID: 24909035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of the sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents; standardization of the antibiogram].
    von Graevenitz A; Heitz M; Lüthy R; Meyer J; Vischer W
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1985 Oct; 74(42):1134-40. PubMed ID: 4070900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Some factors influencing the efficiency of disk-diffusion test to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of microorganisms].
    Poliak MS; Tsvetkova IA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2007 May; (5):36-9. PubMed ID: 17668459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Theory and practice in estimation of microorganism sensitivity to antimicrobial preparations by the disc diffusion method].
    Poliak MS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2003 Jan; (1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12619506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic program of quality control in clinical microbiology.
    Glasser L; Bosley GS; Boring JR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1971 Sep; 56(3):379-83. PubMed ID: 4937606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for antimicrobial resistance in normal bacterial flora of the skin using the replica plating method.
    Paavilainen T; Osterblad M; Leistevuo T; Huovinen P; Kotilainen P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Dec; 19(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 11205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control. Treatment of the 'persistent offender'.
    Stokes EJ
    Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Oct; 68(10):611-3. PubMed ID: 1108032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Techniques used for the determination of antimicrobial resistance and sensitivity in bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents Research Group.
    Piddock LJ
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Apr; 68(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 2190965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardization of Operator-Dependent Variables Affecting Precision and Accuracy of the Disk Diffusion Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.
    Hombach M; Maurer FP; Pfiffner T; Böttger EC; Furrer R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 53(12):3864-9. PubMed ID: 26468500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The correlation between the MICs deduced from Showa disk method and the MICs determined by micro-dilution method].
    Moroizumi S; Kasitani F; Isikawa M; Iwata M; Ohno A; Yamaguchi K
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Oct; 42(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 7996716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rapid method for measuring antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria.
    Mahony DE; Chadwick P
    Can J Microbiol; 1965 Oct; 11(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 5327646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent.
    Hirsh DC; Ruehl WW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 185(10):1058-61. PubMed ID: 6392230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for calculating the efficiency of bacterial surface sampling techniques.
    Whyte W; Carson W; Hambraeus A
    J Hosp Infect; 1989 Jan; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 2564016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing system.
    Sewell DL; Makler MT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jul; 76(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 7258155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg susceptibility testing results.
    Nayak R; Call V; Kaldhone P; Tyler C; Anderson G; Phillips S; Kerdahi K; Foley SL
    Clin Med Res; 2007 Jun; 5(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 17607044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for antibacterial susceptibility in vitro].
    Soriano F; Fernández-Roblas R
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1995 Mar; 13(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 7734498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of disc sensitivity tests on organisms of intermediate sensitivity.
    Waterworth PM
    J Med Lab Technol; 1969 Apr; 26(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 4891554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Antimicrobial drug therapy and microbial sensitivity tests--antibiotics and microbial sensitivity tests].
    Kanno H
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jul; Suppl 105():174-81. PubMed ID: 9379537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.