140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15646279)
21. Kinematics of cranial ontogeny: heterotopy, heterochrony, and geometric morphometric analysis of growth models.
Zollikofer CP; Ponce de León MS
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2004 May; 302(3):322-40. PubMed ID: 15211689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in the cranium of Bornean orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus): II. Allometry and heterochrony.
Leutenegger W; Masterson TJ
Z Morphol Anthropol; 1989; 78(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2603471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ontogenetic allometry and cranial shape diversification among human populations from South America.
Gonzalez PN; Perez SI; Bernal V
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Nov; 294(11):1864-74. PubMed ID: 21957064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cranial ontogenetic variation in early saurischians and the role of heterochrony in the diversification of predatory dinosaurs.
Foth C; Hedrick BP; Ezcurra MD
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1589. PubMed ID: 26839749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Constructing cranial ontogenetic trajectories: A comparison of growth, development, and chronological age proxies using a known-age sample of Macaca mulatta.
Simons EA; Frost SR
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Oct; 161(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 27324987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids.
Schaefer K; Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bernhard M; Bookstein FL
Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):471-8. PubMed ID: 15646280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Discrimination of extant Pan species and subspecies using the enamel-dentine junction morphology of lower molars.
Skinner MM; Gunz P; Wood BA; Boesch C; Hublin JJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19382140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inter- and intra-specific variation in the ontogeny of the hominoid facial skeleton: testing assumptions of ontogenetic variability.
Vioarsdóttir US; Cobb S
Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):423-8. PubMed ID: 15646274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dispelling dog dogma: an investigation of heterochrony in dogs using 3D geometric morphometric analysis of skull shape.
Drake AG
Evol Dev; 2011; 13(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 21410876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Age-related changes in thyroid hormone levels of bonobos and chimpanzees indicate heterochrony in development.
Behringer V; Deschner T; Murtagh R; Stevens JM; Hohmann G
J Hum Evol; 2014 Jan; 66():83-8. PubMed ID: 24275194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ontogeny of robusticity of craniofacial traits in modern humans: a study of South American populations.
Gonzalez PN; Perez SI; Bernal V
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Jul; 142(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20013868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using geometric morphometric visualizations of directional selection gradients to investigate morphological differentiation.
Weaver TD; Gunz P
Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):838-850. PubMed ID: 29510468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes.
Esquerré D; Sherratt E; Keogh JS
Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2829-2844. PubMed ID: 29076160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ontogeny, phylogeny, and morphology in anuran larvae: morphometric analysis of cranial development and evolution in Rana tadpoles (Anura: Ranidae).
Larson PM
J Morphol; 2005 Apr; 264(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 15688441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The 'temporal effect' in hominids: Reinvestigating the nature of support for a chimp-human clade in bone morphology.
Pearson A; Groves C; Cardini A
J Hum Evol; 2015 Nov; 88():146-159. PubMed ID: 26363669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ontogeny and phylogeny of the cercopithecine cranium: A geometric morphometric approach to comparing shape change trajectories.
Simons EA; Frost SR; Singleton M
J Hum Evol; 2018 Nov; 124():40-51. PubMed ID: 30173884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurements of postnatal growth of the skull of Pan troglodytes verus using lateral cephalograms.
Arnold WH; Protsch von Zieten R; Schmidt E
Anthropol Anz; 2003 Mar; 61(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 12712770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brief communication: dental development timing in captive Pan paniscus with comparisons to Pan troglodytes.
Bolter DR; Zihlman AL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Aug; 145(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 21541924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Gavialis-Tomistoma debate: the contribution of skull ontogenetic allometry and growth trajectories to the study of crocodylian relationships.
Piras P; Colangelo P; Adams DC; Buscalioni A; Cubo J; Kotsakis T; Meloro C; Raia P
Evol Dev; 2010; 12(6):568-79. PubMed ID: 21040423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Primate cranial diversity.
Fleagle JG; Gilbert CC; Baden AL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Aug; 142(4):565-78. PubMed ID: 20186744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
