These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15646590)

  • 1. Resin composites in minimally invasive dentistry.
    Jacobsen T
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2 Suppl 1():307-11. PubMed ID: 15646590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Mjor IA
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 15544214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Split increment horizontal layering: a simplified placement technique for direct posterior resin restorations.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 16366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Blum IR; Frazier KB; Haisch LD; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22298557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
    Shannon AT
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series.
    Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 8636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "The simplified concept": predictable posterior composites.
    Smithson J
    Dent Today; 2012 Jan; 31(1):136-8, 140. PubMed ID: 22360120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.