BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15646889)

  • 1. Assessment of left atrial volumes in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation using the biplane area-length method and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with TrueFISP.
    Sievers B; Kirchberg S; Addo M; Bakan A; Brandts B; Trappe HJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2004; 6(4):855-63. PubMed ID: 15646889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: a fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
    Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Verhaert D; Calleja A; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; De Michelis N; Simonetti O; Rajagopalan S; Ryan T; Vannan MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 22421168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single and biplane TrueFISP cardiovascular magnetic resonance for rapid evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
    Sievers B; Brandts B; Franken U; Trappe HJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2004; 6(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 15347123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How much are atrial volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging influenced by the ECG gating method?
    Sievers B; Addo M; Kirchberg S; Bakan A; John-Puthenveettil B; Franken U; Trappe HJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15959972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-study and inter-technique validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging derived left atrial ejection fraction as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
    Kanagala P; Arnold JR; Singh A; Khan JN; Gulsin GS; Gupta P; Squire IB; Ng LL; McCann GP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):921-928. PubMed ID: 32030576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.
    Busch S; Johnson TR; Wintersperger BJ; Minaifar N; Bhargava A; Rist C; Reiser MF; Becker C; Nikolaou K
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17909817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the ECG gating method on ventricular volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sievers B; Addo M; Kirchberg S; Bakan A; John-Puthenveettil B; Franken U; Trappe HJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):441-6. PubMed ID: 15881527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biplane versus short-axis measures of the left atrium and ventricle in patients with systolic dysfunction assessed by magnetic resonance.
    Nanni S; Westenberg JJ; Bax JJ; Siebelink HM; de Roos A; Kroft LJ
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(5):907-12. PubMed ID: 27183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of two "fast" software tools for the measurement of left ventricular volumes in retrospectively ECG-gated multidetector CT of the heart: biplane area-length method and "shape tracking" method].
    Begemann PG; Stahmer F; Stork A; Weiss F; Adam G; Lorenz C; von Berg J
    Rofo; 2007 Jun; 179(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 17377874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Compressed Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging Combined With Area-Length Method in Normal Sinus Rhythm and Atrial Fibrillation.
    Yin G; Cui C; An J; Zhao K; Yang K; Li S; Yang X; Wang J; Dong Z; Yu S; He J; Chen X; Lu M; Zhao S
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():896816. PubMed ID: 35711346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of right ventricle volumes, function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Catalano O; Antonaci S; Opasich C; Moro G; Mussida M; Perotti M; Calsamiglia G; Frascaroli M; Baldi M; Cobelli F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Oct; 8(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 17885519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atrial and ventricular volume and function in persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation, a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Therkelsen SK; Groenning BA; Svendsen JH; Jensen GB
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 15881530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left atrial volume assessment in atrial fibrillation using multimodality imaging: a comparison of echocardiography, invasive three-dimensional CARTO and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rabbat MG; Wilber D; Thomas K; Malick O; Bashir A; Agrawal A; Biswas S; Sanagala T; Syed MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):1011-8. PubMed ID: 25761533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Sievers B; Kirchberg S; Bakan A; Franken U; Trappe HJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2004; 6(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 15054924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction.
    Takenaka A; Iwase M; Sobue T; Yokota M
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 8596064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Left ventricular functional parameters: comparison of 16-slice spiral CT with MRI].
    Heuschmid M; Rothfuss J; Schröder S; Küttner A; Fenchel M; Stauder N; Mahnken AH; Burgstahler C; Miller S; Claussen CD; Kopp AF
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 15657821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A
    Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of the left atrium applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinical routine.
    Funk S; Kermer J; Doganguezel S; Schwenke C; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Schulz-Menger J
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Apr; 52(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 29303369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.