BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15647073)

  • 61. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Holland R; Hendriks JH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Can mammographic findings help discriminate between atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ after needle core biopsy?
    Hoang JK; Hill P; Cawson JN
    Breast; 2008 Jun; 17(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 18063369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease?
    Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Wilson AR
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 11678555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation.
    Hassell P; Klein-Parker H; Worth A; Poon P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Dec; 50(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10659059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
    Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
    Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
    Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Screen-detected mucinous breast carcinoma: potential for delayed diagnosis.
    Dhillon R; Depree P; Metcalf C; Wylie E
    Clin Radiol; 2006 May; 61(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 16679116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Predictive value of needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening.
    El-Sayed ME; Rakha EA; Reed J; Lee AH; Evans AJ; Ellis IO
    Histopathology; 2008 Dec; 53(6):650-7. PubMed ID: 19076681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Microtome shaving radiography: demonstration of loss of mammographic microcalcifications during histologic sectioning.
    Winston JS; Geradts J; Liu DF; Stomper PC
    Breast J; 2004; 10(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 15125745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma.
    Krishnamurthy S; Sneige N; Thompson PA; Marcy SM; Singletary SE; Cristofanilli M; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12704689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
    Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Mucocele-like Lesions of the Breast.
    Solomon WT; Dale PS
    Am Surg; 2022 Sep; 88(9):2248-2249. PubMed ID: 35674064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
    Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
    Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fine-needle aspiration of breast biopsy specimens: correlation of histologic and cytologic findings.
    Teixidor HS; Wojtasek DA; Reiches EM; Santos-Buch CA; Minick CR
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1319077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
    Kuzmiak CM; Dancel R; Pisano E; Zeng D; Cole E; Koomen MA; McLelland R
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy.
    Mercado CL; Hamele-Bena D; Oken SM; Singer CI; Cangiarella J
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 16424237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparative cytology of mucocelelike lesion and mucinous carcinoma of the breast in fine needle aspiration.
    Wong NL; Wan SK
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(5):765-70. PubMed ID: 11015977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
    Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Can mucinous lesions of the breast be reliably diagnosed by core needle biopsy?
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jul; 118(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 12109860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.