140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1564737)
1. Visual fields in glaucoma and neuro-ophthalmology.
Best SJ
J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1992; 11(2):46-56. PubMed ID: 1564737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Chandrasekhar G; Kunjam V; Rao VS; Nutheti R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12701860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perimetry.
Phelps CD
Ann Ophthalmol; 1978 Nov; 10(11):1527-8. PubMed ID: 727629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Automated perimetry and neuro-ophthalmology. Topographic correlation].
Muñoz Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2002 Aug; 77(8):413-28. PubMed ID: 12185617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures.
Vandeveer MR; Norden LC
J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differential diagnosis in visual field defects of glaucoma patients].
Brunotte I; Haubitz B; Winter R; Meyer MW
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Feb; 225(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 18293271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements.
Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Läärä E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Nov; 38(12):2452-9. PubMed ID: 9375562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic diagnosis].
Gruber H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1985 Aug; 97(15):620-2. PubMed ID: 3901537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields.
Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Vasile C; Boehm AG; Sejnowski T; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2660-5. PubMed ID: 12147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
