These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15648041)

  • 1. Monitoring outcomes with relational databases: does it improve quality of care?
    Clemmer TP
    J Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 19(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 15648041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care.
    Rubenfeld GD
    J Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 19(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 15648042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring and improving quality using information systems.
    Bates DW; Pappius EM; Kuperman GJ; Sittig D; Burstin H; Fairchild D; Brennan TA; Teich JM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():814-8. PubMed ID: 10384573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical analytics equal better systemwide outcomes.
    Pollom RK; Balbach J; Jones KA
    Nurs Manage; 2007 Dec; 38(12):44-8. PubMed ID: 18188008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving outcomes while reducing utilization: an ICU case study.
    Thompson DI; Olive MA; French RM
    Healthc Inf Manage; 1996; 10(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10155792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.
    LaRovere JM; Jeffries HE; Sachdeva RC; Rice TB; Wetzel RC; Cooper DS; Bird GL; Ghanayem NS; Checchia PA; Chang AC; Wessel DL
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():130-6. PubMed ID: 19063783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do you measure success? Healthcare looks to benchmarking to improve business processes.
    Schneider P
    Healthc Inform; 1998 Mar; 15(3):44-50, 52, 56. PubMed ID: 10177694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. WISECARE. Workflow information systems for European nursing care.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 73():3-312. PubMed ID: 11153484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provider revamps data program through integration.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Feb; 2(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 10345358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disease management as a performance improvement strategy.
    McClatchey S
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 Nov; 22(2):15-23. PubMed ID: 11761788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ["Healthy cities"--requirements and performance. Questionnaire results and a suggestion on quality monitoring (healthy-cities-barometer)].
    Plümer KD; Trojan A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 15088226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Data sources for continual quality improvement in medical rehabilitation- the QS-Reha procedure of the statutory health insurance funds and the Eva-Reha documentation system of MDK Rhineland-palatinate].
    Bassler M; Nosper M; Follert P; Böwering L; Polak U
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Jun; 46(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 17582556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From airports to care centers. Transferring information technology to support patient care reengineering.
    Vogel LH; Bonomo C; Yang A
    Healthc Inform; 1998 Nov; 15(11):115-6, 118. PubMed ID: 10185699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking to the road for PI: use the balance scorecard to find your way.
    Behrens L; Oldenkamp M
    Lippincotts Case Manag; 2000; 5(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 16397990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical database for intensive care patients].
    Rønholm E; Christensen S; Andersen JS; Jensen RH; Sørensen HT
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb; 169(8):724-7. PubMed ID: 17313928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can outcome prediction data change patient outcomes and organizational outcomes?
    Rothen HU; Takala J
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Oct; 14(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 18787442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of acute stroke care improvement framework for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry: facilitating policy and system change at the hospital level.
    LaBresh KA;
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Dec; 31(6 Suppl 2):S246-50. PubMed ID: 17178313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons learned during 15 years of clinical information system experience.
    Miranda D; Fields W; Lund K
    Comput Nurs; 2001; 19(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 11477738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiology.
    Jenkins KJ; Beekman Iii RH; Bergersen LJ; Everett AD; Forbes TJ; Franklin RC; Klitzner TS; Krogman ON; Martin GR; Webb CL
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():116-23. PubMed ID: 19063781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving care at cystic fibrosis centers through quality improvement.
    Kraynack NC; McBride JT
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2009 Oct; 30(5):547-58. PubMed ID: 19760542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.