These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15648452)

  • 1. Soft copy using image processing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions: is it actually cost-effective?
    Abe K; Kosuda S; Iwasaki Y; Hama Y; Kaji T; Kusano S; Ozeki Y; Ichihara K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 15648452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hard-copy versus soft-copy with and without simple image manipulation for detection of pulmonary nodules and masses.
    Kosuda S; Kaji T; Kobayashi H; Watanabe M; Iwasaki Y; Kusano S
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 11016758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography.
    Ueda K; Iwasaki S; Nagasawa M; Sueyoshi S; Takahama J; Ide K; Kichikawa K
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hard- and soft-copy digital chest images with different matrix sizes for managing coronary care unit patients.
    Steckel RJ; Batra P; Johnson S; Sayre J; Brown K; Haker K; Young D; Zucker M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 7726034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting requirements for skeletal digital radiography: comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy presentation.
    O'Connor PJ; Davies AG; Fowler RC; Lintott DJ; Bury RF; Parkin GJ; Martinez D; Saifuddin A; Cowen AR
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):249-54. PubMed ID: 9530323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
    Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metastases of colorectal carcinoma: comparison of soft- and hard-copy helical CT interpretation.
    Pijl ME; Wasser MN; Joekes EC; van de Velde CJ; Bloem JL
    Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 12702822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.
    Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann DL; Evens RG; Siegel MJ
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 7480702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Hemminger BM; Brown ML; Johnston RE; Kuzmiak CM; Braeuning MP; Freimanis RI; Soo MS; Baker JA; Walsh R
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 11997557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography.
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Marten K; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Skaane P; Grabbe E
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Dec; 16(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 14749966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: a hard- versus soft-copy comparative study].
    Bricault I; Bosson JL; Declety P; Lavagne P; Ferretti G
    J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):993-9. PubMed ID: 13679753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
    Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement.
    Weatherburn GC; Ridout D; Strickland NH; Robins P; Glastonbury CM; Curati W; Harvey C; Shadbolt C
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 12927664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.