These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15649084)

  • 1. Correlating the ground truth of mammographic histology with the success or failure of imaging.
    Tot T
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15649084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereotactic 14G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: what is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy?
    Rich PM; Michell MJ; Humphreys S; Howes GP; Nunnerley HB
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Jun; 54(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 10406340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumors.
    Alexander MC; Yankaskas BC; Biesemier KW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16794151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Holland R; Hendriks JH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
    Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
    Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
    Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of mammographic evaluation of breast cancer in women less than 40 years of age: experience from a single medical center in Taiwan.
    Wang J; Chang KJ; Kuo WH; Lee HT; Shih TT
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2007 Sep; 106(9):736-47. PubMed ID: 17908663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in non palpable breast lesions: a series of 791 cases].
    Dorel-LeTheo M; Dales JP; Garcia S; Ramuz O; Andrac-Meyer L; Bonnier P; Piana L; Charpin-Taranger C
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Apr; 90(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 12801819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; Patiño JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
    de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC
    Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic error in breast disease.
    Meyer KK
    Am Surg; 1975 Dec; 41(12):774-85. PubMed ID: 173216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Böhner C; Uder M; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 17436183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship of mammographic microcalcification to histologic malignancy: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Homer MJ; Safaii H; Smith TJ; Marchant DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Dec; 153(6):1187-9. PubMed ID: 2816630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography of breast carcinoma: experience of 108 cases.
    Ng SH; Ko SF; Lee CM; Pai SC; Tsai CC; Chen SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Jun; 90(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 1680998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
    Bhothisuwan W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
    Kettritz U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.