99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15649092)
1. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions.
Diebold T; Jacobi V; Scholz B; Hensel C; Solbach C; Kaufmann M; Viana F; Balzer J; Peters J; Vogl T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 15649092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis.
Martín G; Martín R; Brieva MJ; Santamaría L
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 12042956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions.
Wersebe A; Siegmann K; Krainick U; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Invest Radiol; 2002 Feb; 37(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 11799329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The role of stereotactic 11G vacuum biopsy for clarification of BI-RADS IV findings in mammography].
Diebold T; Jacobi V; Krapfl E; von Minckwitz G; Solbach C; Ballenberger S; Hochmuth K; Balzer JO; Fellbaum M; Kaufmann M; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 12677503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical impedance scanning in breast tumor imaging: correlation with the growth pattern of lesion.
Wang K; Wang T; Fu F; Ji ZY; Liu RG; Liao QM; Dong XZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jul; 122(13):1501-6. PubMed ID: 19719937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.
Malich A; Böhm T; Facius M; Freessmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Dec; 37(18):2324-30. PubMed ID: 11720824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Bode MK; Rissanen T
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrical impedance scanning-application of this new technique for lymph node evaluation in children.
Mentzel HJ; Malich A; Kentouche K; Freesmeyer M; Böttcher J; Schneider G; Gruhn B; Vogt S; Zintl F; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Pediatr Radiol; 2003 Jul; 33(7):461-6. PubMed ID: 12728287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical impedance scanning used in addition to ultrasound for the verification of submandibular and parotid lesions: initial results.
Facius M; Malich A; Schneider G; Boehm T; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Invest Radiol; 2002 Aug; 37(8):421-7. PubMed ID: 12138357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of sonographically suspicious and highly suspicious lymph nodes of the head-neck region.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Mentzel HJ; Fleck M; Boettcher J; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2002 May; 12(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 11976855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
