99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15649092)
21. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study.
Sanders MA; Roland L; Sahoo S
Breast J; 2010; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19929890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. (99M)Technetium-sestamibi scintimammography in non-palpable breast lesions found on screening X-ray mammography.
Gommans GM; van der Zant FM; van Dongen A; Boer RO; Teule GJ; de Waard JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 33(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 17126524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3).
Gruber R; Jaromi S; Rudas M; Pfarl G; Riedl CC; Flöry D; Graf O; Sickles EA; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22429299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning.
Malich A; Facius M; Anderson R; Böttcher J; Sauner D; Hansch A; Marx C; Petrovitch A; Pfleiderer S; Kaiser W
Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2441-6. PubMed ID: 12845465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of lesion vascularisation on tumours detection by electrical impedance scanning at 200 Hz.
Malich A; Scholz B; Kott A; Facius M; Fischer D; Freesmeyer M
Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2007 Oct; 3(4):e33. PubMed ID: 21614295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: incremental value versus mammography.
Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Manca A; Cottu P; Fancellu A; Nuvoli S; Madeddu G
Int J Oncol; 2012 Aug; 41(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 22641247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroid surgery: a prospective study.
Stojadinovic A; Fields SI; Shriver CD; Lenington S; Ginor R; Peoples GE; Burch HB; Peretz T; Freund HR; Nissan A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15827796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adjunctive diagnostic value of targeted electrical impedance imaging to conventional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions.
Szabó BK; Saracco A; Wilczek B; Boné B; Aspelin P
Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):782-90. PubMed ID: 16392602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective trial evaluating electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroidectomy: final results.
Nissan A; Peoples GE; Abu-Wasel B; Adair CF; Prus D; Howard RS; Lenington SG; Fields SI; Freund HR; Peretz T; Burch HB; Shriver CD; Stojadinovic A
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 18438123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical value of computer-assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience].
Renz DM; Baltzer PA; Kullnig PE; Böttcher J; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2008 Nov; 180(11):968-76. PubMed ID: 18855300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience with 249 patients].
Travade A; Isnard A; Bagard C; Bouchet F; Chouzet S; Gaillot A; Vilmant R
J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 83(9 Pt 1):1063-71. PubMed ID: 12223915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
