These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15649179)

  • 1. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of techniques for measuring contrast sensitivity in children.
    Brown VA; Woodhouse JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 3748562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rocket-ship psychophysics. Assessing visual functioning in young children.
    Abramov I; Hainline L; Turkel J; Lemerise E; Smith H; Gordon J; Petry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Nov; 25(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 6490332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics.
    Vaegan ; Rahman AM; Sanderson GF
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):547-58. PubMed ID: 18594348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing reliability and sensitivity of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for establishing point tactile thresholds.
    Tracey EH; Greene AJ; Doty RL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(4):982-6. PubMed ID: 22100625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The optical quality of the human eye revisited.
    Webb RM; Sahal A; Morrison JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):516-21. PubMed ID: 9666926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two contrast sensitivity tests and their usefulness as a screener for aircrew.
    McFadden SM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Aug; 65(8):710-7. PubMed ID: 7980330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating chromatic contrast thresholds from the transient visual evoked potential.
    Boon MY; Suttle CM; Henry B
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2367-83. PubMed ID: 15979463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying rod photoreceptor-mediated vision in retinal degenerations: dark-adapted thresholds as outcome measures.
    Roman AJ; Schwartz SB; Aleman TS; Cideciyan AV; Chico JD; Windsor EA; Gardner LM; Ying GS; Smilko EE; Maguire MG; Jacobson SG
    Exp Eye Res; 2005 Feb; 80(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 15670804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring contrast sensitivity of the human eye with modified Siemens stars.
    Grein HJ; Jungnickel H; Strohm K; Gebhardt M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):501-12. PubMed ID: 20473233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Objective evaluation of contrast sensitivity by visual evoked potentials].
    Zanlonghi X; Bocquet X
    Ophtalmologie; 1989; 3(3):242-3. PubMed ID: 2641124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERGs and psychophysical thresholds in students with reading discomfort.
    Ridder WH; Borsting E; Tosha C; Tong A; Dougherty R; Chase C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18317333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The Freiburg Vision Test. A computer-assisted procedure with sequential strategy].
    Mittelviefhaus K; Bach M; Jedynak A; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmologe; 1993 Apr; 90(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 8490293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.