147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1564989)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the uterus at an ultra low (0.02 T) magnetic field.
Varpula M; Komu M; Klemi P
Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 10(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 1564989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasms.
Hirano Y; Kubo K; Hirai Y; Okada S; Yamada K; Sawano S; Yamashita T; Hiramatsu Y
Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1561414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas and their complications.
Hamlin DJ; Pettersson H; Fitzsimmons J; Morgan LS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(5):902-7. PubMed ID: 4031167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the uterus in vivo and in vitro at an ultra low magnetic field (0.02 T): assessment of its normal structure and of leiomyomas.
Varpula M; Kiilholma P; Klemi P; Komu M
Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(8):1139-45. PubMed ID: 7854019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms.
Hricak H; Tscholakoff D; Heinrichs L; Fisher MR; Dooms GC; Reinhold C; Jaffe RB
Radiology; 1986 Feb; 158(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 3753623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in uterine disease].
Kasai M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jul; 42(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 2212809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of uterine carcinoma: correlation with clinical and pathologic findings.
Posniak HV; Olson MC; Dudiak CM; Castelli MJ; Dolan J; Wisniewski RA; Isaacs JH; Sharma SK; Bychkov V
Radiographics; 1990 Jan; 10(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 2296693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uterine junctional zone: MR study of water content and relaxation properties.
McCarthy S; Scott G; Majumdar S; Shapiro B; Thompson S; Lange R; Gore J
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):241-3. PubMed ID: 2928531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging relaxation times of female reproductive organs.
Takatsu Y; Okada T; Miyati T; Koyama T
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):997-1001. PubMed ID: 25210077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging.
Brown HK; Stoll BS; Nicosia SV; Fiorica JV; Hambley PS; Clarke LP; Silbiger ML
Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 1707545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the diagnostic value of quantitative parameters based on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced MRI with psoas muscle and outer myometrium as internal references for differentiating uterine sarcomas from leiomyomas at 3T MRI.
Malek M; Rahmani M; Seyyed Ebrahimi SM; Tabibian E; Alidoosti A; Rahimifar P; Akhavan S; Gandomkar Z
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):20. PubMed ID: 30935419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser ablation of the endometrium: MR appearance during and after treatment and the relation of MR appearance to clinical outcome.
deSouza NM; McMillan DL; Puni RK; Coutts GA; Hall AS; Harris DN; Young IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T2 relaxometry mapping in demonstrating layered uterine architecture: parameter optimization and utility in endometrial carcinoma and adenomyosis: a feasibility study.
Ghosh A; Singh T; Bagga R; Srinivasan R; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 91(1081):20170377. PubMed ID: 28936889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abnormal uterine cavity: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
Imaoka I; Sugimura K; Masui T; Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Naito M
Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Dec; 17(10):1445-55. PubMed ID: 10609993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. T2-weighted MRI of the uterus: fast spin echo vs. breath-hold fast spin echo.
Ascher SM; O'Malley J; Semelka RC; Patt RH; Rajan S; Thomasson D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Mar; 9(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 10194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Junctional Zone Endometrium Morphological Characteristics and Functionality: Review of the Literature.
Tanos V; Lingwood L; Balami S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(2):107-117. PubMed ID: 31968333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The normal uterus on magnetic resonance imaging and variations associated with the hormonal state.
Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Delannoy L; Chagnaud C; Kasbarian M
Surg Radiol Anat; 1991; 13(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 1754956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physiological changes of the human uterine myometrium during menstrual cycle: preliminary evaluation using BOLD MR imaging.
Kido A; Koyama T; Kataoka M; Yamamoto A; Saga T; Turner R; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):695-700. PubMed ID: 17729347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
