BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15649954)

  • 1. Commentary: Empirical evidence of attrition bias in clinical trials.
    Jüni P; Egger M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 15649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Introduction to randomized trials: attrition bias].
    Simon EG; Fouché CJ; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 22192692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The design and use of cluster randomised controlled trials in evaluating injury prevention interventions: part 1. Rationale, design and informed consent.
    DiGuiseppi C; Coupland C
    Inj Prev; 2010 Feb; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20179039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Last-observation-carried-forward imputation method in clinical efficacy trials: review of 352 antidepressant studies.
    Woolley SB; Cardoni AA; Goethe JW
    Pharmacotherapy; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1408-16. PubMed ID: 19947800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
    Molnar FJ; Hutton B; Fergusson D
    CMAJ; 2008 Oct; 179(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 18838445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.
    Kane RL; Wang J; Garrard J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.
    Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ; Hewitt CE
    BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7547):969-71. PubMed ID: 16627519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
    Rosner A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attrition in substance abuse comparative treatment research: the illusion of randomization.
    Howard KI; Cox WM; Saunders SM
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1990; 104():66-79. PubMed ID: 2092226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials.
    Stanley K
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1819-22. PubMed ID: 17404173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active control trials for epilepsy: avoiding bias in head-to-head trials.
    French JA; Kryscio RJ
    Neurology; 2006 May; 66(9):1294-5. PubMed ID: 16682655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent design and conduct of clinical trials.
    Yusuf S; Bosch J
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 17170033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: methodological issues in psychopharmacology.
    Leon AC; Mallinckrodt CH; Chuang-Stein C; Archibald DG; Archer GE; Chartier K
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):1001-5. PubMed ID: 16503329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.