These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15650858)

  • 1. Accuracy of a new photo-refractometer in young and adult patients.
    Schimitzek T; Lagrèze WA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 243(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 15650858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.
    Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens.
    Ayse YK; Onder U; Suheyla K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 46(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21708083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accomodative tone in children under general anesthesia.
    Salchow DJ; Marcus I; Golembeski TJ; Wang X; Li F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 156(5):1034-1039.e2. PubMed ID: 23972304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the PlusOptix S09 and Spot Vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy.
    Dikkaya F; Erdur SK
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 30255489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children.
    Guha S; Shah S; Shah K; Hurakadli P; Majee D; Gandhi S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27426488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors.
    Schimitzek T; Haase W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 12271366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.
    Cordonnier M; Dramaix M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 83(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10396190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Examination of preschool children for refractive errors. First experience using a handheld autorefractor].
    Büchner TF; Schnorbus U; Grenzebach UH; Stupp T; Busse H
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Nov; 100(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 14669034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of off-the-visual-axis retinoscopy on objective refractive measurement.
    Jackson DW; Paysse EA; Wilhelmus KR; Hussein MA; Rosby G; Coats DK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 137(6):1101-4. PubMed ID: 15183796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the appropriate age cut-off for cycloplegia in refraction?
    Sanfilippo PG; Chu BS; Bigault O; Kearns LS; Boon MY; Young TL; Hammond CJ; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 92(6):e458-62. PubMed ID: 24641244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
    Ozdemir O; Özen Tunay Z; Petriçli IS; Ergintürk Acar D; Erol MK
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 25709922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).
    Choi M; Weiss S; Schaeffel F; Seidemann A; Howland HC; Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):537-48. PubMed ID: 11100892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Refraction Defects in Childhood Measured Using Plusoptix S09, 2WIN Photorefractometer, Benchtop Autorefractometer, and Cycloplegic Retinoscopy.
    Yalcın E; Sultan P; Yılmaz S; Pallikaris IG
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 27142192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the Plusoptix S08 photorefractor to retinoscopy and cycloretinoscopy.
    Mirzajani A; Heirani M; Jafarzadehpur E; Haghani H
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jul; 96(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 23679982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
    Li T; Zhou X; Zhu J; Tang X; Gu X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.