These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15651122)
1. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability. Zinberg JM N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability. Erb CT; Rich RF N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act. Hansen E Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability. Ruger TW J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ready and willing. Borges W Tex Med; 2003 Jun; 99(6):35-7. PubMed ID: 12836574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The "Texas bill". Ortolon K Tex Med; 1998 Apr; 94(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 9564256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Case law update. State law negligence actions against MCOs are pre-empted by ERISA. West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 20196010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care. Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations. Jost TS Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients' bill of rights: legislative cure-all or prescription for disaster? Binette MJ North Carol Law Rev; 2003; 81():653-96. PubMed ID: 15744898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Credentialing liability in the managed care arena. Michel CP Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 11475509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ERISA and medical professional liability. Griffen FD; Adelman SH Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 83(7):16-21. PubMed ID: 10345205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Liability of managed care organizations expands. Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cracks in the wall. Court decisions penetrate ERISA's invulnerability. Borges W Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 12674976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption? Trueman DL Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court may be managed care's new best friend. Plunkett LR N Y State Dent J; 2000 Nov; 66(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 11143725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal liability, denial of benefits and managed care. Empey CS; Cwiek M Mich Health Hosp; 1999; 35(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 10621029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]