214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15651563)
21. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT.
Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kim TS; Kwon O; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S279-88. PubMed ID: 15798241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Image reconstruction incorporated with the skull inhomogeneity for electrical impedance tomography.
Ni A; Dong X; Yang G; Fu F; Tang C
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jul; 32(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 18501557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modelling the electrical properties of bladder tissue--quantifying impedance changes due to inflammation and oedema.
Walker DC; Smallwood RH; Keshtar A; Wilkinson BA; Hamdy FC; Lee JA
Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 15798300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel approach for EIT regularization via spatial and spectral principal component analysis.
Goharian M; Bruwer MJ; Jegatheesan A; Moran GR; MacGregor JF
Physiol Meas; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1001-16. PubMed ID: 17827649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simulation of intraluminal impedance.
al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():48-52. PubMed ID: 12724867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation on magnetoacoustic signal generation with magnetic induction and its application to electrical conductivity reconstruction.
Ma Q; He B
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5085-99. PubMed ID: 17671355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The contribution of vessel volume change and blood resistivity change to the electrical impedance pulse.
Ravi Shankar TM; Webster JG; Shao SY
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1985 Mar; 32(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 3997176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Simple linear models of scanning impedance imaging for fast reconstruction of relative conductivity of biological samples.
Oliphant TE; Liu H; Hawkins AR; Schultz SM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2323-32. PubMed ID: 17073338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Temporal resolution of the skin impedance measurement in frequency-domain method.
Fukumoto T; Eom GM; Ohba S; Futami R; Hoshimiya N
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):170-3. PubMed ID: 17260871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monitoring of lung edema using focused impedance spectroscopy: a feasibility study.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 15798294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new geometric factor for in situ resistivity measurement using four slender cylindrical electrodes.
Chong CE; Tan YL
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):594-602. PubMed ID: 18269995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-block electrical model of renal impedance.
Hsu TL; Hsiu H; Chao PT; Li SP; Wang WK; Wang YY
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):387-99. PubMed ID: 15886434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fast nonlinear image reconstruction for scanning impedance imaging.
Liu H; Hawkins AR; Schultz SM; Oliphant TE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):970-7. PubMed ID: 18334388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Gao N; He B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the human prostate.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Heaney JA; Paulsen KD; Schned AR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1321-7. PubMed ID: 17605363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
