119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15651974)
1. Abortion: time to clarify Australia's confusing laws.
Ewing SR
Med J Aust; 2005 Jan; 182(2):94; author reply 94-5. PubMed ID: 15651974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: time to clarify Australia's confusing laws.
De Crespigny LJ; Savulescu J
Med J Aust; 2004 Aug; 181(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 15310254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can, should, ought, must.
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):67-9. PubMed ID: 19998169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does prenatal diagnosis morally require provision of selective abortion?
Buccafurni D; Chang PL
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):65-7. PubMed ID: 19998168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An unjustified exception to an unjust law?
Wasserman D; Asch A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 19998167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: prohibitions and exceptions.
McGuinness S
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):70-2. PubMed ID: 19998171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A closer look at the abortion debate in Iran.
Aramesh K
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):57-8. PubMed ID: 19998164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Iran to Latin America: must prenatal diagnosis necessarily be provided with abortion for congenital abnormalities?
Sperling D
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):61-3. PubMed ID: 19998166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal diagnosis and abortion are not in conflict in Israel.
Zivotofsky AZ; Jotkowitz A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):58-60. PubMed ID: 19998165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management.
McGivern B
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E9. PubMed ID: 16969924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prenatal testing can be advantageous even when abortion is not an option.
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):69-70. PubMed ID: 19998170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal diagnosis, genetics and reproductive decision-making.
Bennett B
J Law Med; 2001 Aug; 9(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 12116669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion: time to clarify Australia's confusing laws.
Reti L
Med J Aust; 2005 Jan; 182(2):94; author reply 94-5. PubMed ID: 15801045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Anencephalic fetuses abortion. ].
Marta GN; Marta TN
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2010; 56(5):506. PubMed ID: 21152816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to open peer commentaries on "Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other?".
Ballantyne A; Newson A; Luna F; Ashcroft R
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W6-7. PubMed ID: 19998146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Northern Ireland's abortion law breaches human rights, court rules.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2015 Nov; 351():h6482. PubMed ID: 26621116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Opinions of decision-makers on the liberalization of abortion laws in Mexico.
van Dijk MG; Lara D; García SG
Salud Publica Mex; 2007; 49(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 18176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Death of baby with anencephaly after mother was refused an abortion sparks controversy in India.
Chaudhuri M
BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e7320. PubMed ID: 23118330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Northern Ireland assembly must decide whether to issue new abortion law.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6896. PubMed ID: 26684328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Abortion is basically evaluated as a crime].
Schell W
Kinderkrankenschwester; 2004 Mar; 23(3):116-7. PubMed ID: 16134626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
