These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15652635)

  • 21. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures.
    Lix LM; Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 26777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
    Rubin DB; Thomas N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):249-64. PubMed ID: 8934595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints.
    O'Brien PC
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1079-87. PubMed ID: 6534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A note on the operating characteristics of the modified F test.
    Blair RC; Sawilowsky S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):935-9. PubMed ID: 8241380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Multivariate repeated measures designs].
    Vallejo G; Lozano LM
    Psicothema; 2006 May; 18(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 17296047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Departure from normality in multivariate normative comparison: the Cramér alternative for Hotelling's T2.
    Grasman RP; Huizenga HM; Geurts HM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Apr; 48(5):1510-6. PubMed ID: 20097216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tests that are robust against variance heterogeneity in k x 2 designs with unequal cell frequencies.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):1011-7. PubMed ID: 7568575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new outlier identification test for method comparison studies based on robust regression.
    Rauch G; Geistanger A; Timm J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):151-69. PubMed ID: 21191861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Ehrhard K; Schmitz B; Thöne J
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 17222566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample sizes for experiments with multivariate repeated measures.
    Guo X; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 May; 6(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 8732911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.