1124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15653085)
1. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.
Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Phillips FM; Magovern B; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Zindrick MR; Hadjipavlou AG; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15653084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjacent level load transfer following vertebral augmentation in the cadaveric spine.
Kayanja MM; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):E790-7. PubMed ID: 17023840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prophylactic vertebroplasty may reduce the risk of adjacent intact vertebra from fatigue injury: an ex vivo biomechanical study.
Chiang CK; Wang YH; Yang CY; Yang BD; Wang JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 19214094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distribution of anterior cortical shear strain after a thoracic wedge compression fracture.
Kayanja MM; Ferrara LA; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2004; 4(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 14749196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading.
Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM
Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18640876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanics of 1, 2, and 3 levels of vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate in multilevel spinal segments.
Kayanja MM; Schlenk R; Togawa D; Ferrara L; Lieberman I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):769-74. PubMed ID: 16582850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures with open vertebral cement augmentation of expandable pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical study and a 2-year follow-up of 20 patients.
Wu ZX; Gao MX; Sang HX; Ma ZS; Cui G; Zhang Y; Lei W
J Surg Res; 2012 Mar; 173(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21067776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine.
Nouda S; Tomita S; Kin A; Kawahara K; Kinoshita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2613-8. PubMed ID: 19910764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.
Zheng Z; Luk KD; Kuang G; Li Z; Lin J; Lam WM; Cheung KM; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2076-82. PubMed ID: 17762808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mechanics of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Kayanja M; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():124-30. PubMed ID: 16462435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: an in vitro study.
Wang XY; Dai LY; Xu HZ; Chi YL
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 15(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 18226530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.
Upasani VV; Robertson C; Lee D; Tomlinson T; Mahar AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1783-8. PubMed ID: 20098352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
