117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15653235)
1. Comparison of different mathematical models to analyze diminution kinetics of ultrasound contrast enhancement in a flow phantom.
Meyer-Wiethe K; Cangür H; Seidel GU
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 15653235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the design of a capillary flow phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents at very low flow velocities.
Veltmann C; Lohmaier S; Schlosser T; Shai S; Ehlgen A; Pohl C; Becher H; Tiemann K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12079699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microcirculation volumetric flow assessment using high-resolution, contrast-assisted images.
Yeh CK; Lu SY; Chen YS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18334315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcranial contrast diminution imaging of the human brain: a pilot study in healthy volunteers.
Meyer K; Seidel G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002; 28(11-12):1433-7. PubMed ID: 12498938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of flow parameters to analyse bolus kinetics of ultrasound contrast enhancement in a capillary flow model.
Cangür H; Meyer-Wiethe K; Seidel G
Ultraschall Med; 2004 Dec; 25(6):418-21. PubMed ID: 15597234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved flow measurement using microbubble contrast agents and disruption-replenishment: clinical application to tumour monitoring.
Hudson JM; Williams R; Lloyd B; Atri M; Kim TK; Bjarnason G; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1210-21. PubMed ID: 21683508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of the renal blood flow in macro- and microcirculation by means of pulse inversion imaging].
Schlosser T; Veltmann C; Lohmaier S; Ehlgen A; Kuntz-Hehner S; Tiemann K; Becher H
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):724-30. PubMed ID: 15122472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of a new mathematical model for the computation of numerical parameters related to renal cortical blood flow and fractional blood volume by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Quaia E; Nocentini A; Torelli L
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):616-27. PubMed ID: 19193486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.
Hudson JM; Karshafian R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2007-20. PubMed ID: 19822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of ultrasound contrast destruction imaging for flow quantification.
Lucidarme O; Kono Y; Corbeil J; Choi SH; Mattrey RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1697-704. PubMed ID: 14698337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: "entrance in the section" phenomenon--phantom and rabbit study.
Lucidarme O; Franchi-Abella S; Correas JM; Bridal SL; Kurtisovski E; Berger G
Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):473-9. PubMed ID: 12802003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 22214685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood flow assessment by ultrasound-induced destruction of echocontrast agents using harmonic power Doppler imaging: which parameters determine contrast replenishment curves?
Köster J; Schlosser T; Pohl C; Lentz C; Lohmaier S; Veltmann C; Kuntz-Hehner S; Omran H; Lüderitz B; Becher H; Tiemann K
Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11182774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of semiquantitative ultrasonic perfusion imaging of the brain.
Eyding J; Wilkening W; Reckhardt M; Meves S; Postert T
J Neuroimaging; 2004 Apr; 14(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 15095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion.
Mahoney M; Sorace A; Warram J; Samuel S; Hoyt K
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1427-37. PubMed ID: 25063408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of flow rates using harmonic grey-scale imaging and an ultrasound contrast agent: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Claassen L; Seidel G; Algermissen C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 11295274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vascular flow and perfusion imaging with ultrasound contrast agents.
Bruce M; Averkiou M; Tiemann K; Lohmaier S; Powers J; Beach K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 15219953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal blood flow quantification in pigs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an ex vivo study.
Hoeffel C; Mulé S; Huwart L; Frouin F; Jais JP; Helenon O; Correas JM
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 20408121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
