324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15653298)
1. Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time.
Kida N; Oda S; Matsumura M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 15653298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sport-specific decision-making in a Go/NoGo reaction task: difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players.
Nakamoto H; Mori S
Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 18459365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
Nakamoto H; Mori S
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between visual reaction time and batting, fielding, and earned run averages among players of the Southern Baseball League.
Classé JG; Semes LP; Daum KM; Nowakowski R; Alexander LJ; Wisniewski J; Beisel JA; Mann K; Rutstein R; Smith M; Bartolucci A
J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Jan; 68(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9037989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skill-Specific Changes in Somatosensory Nogo Potentials in Baseball Players.
Yamashiro K; Sato D; Onishi H; Sugawara K; Nakazawa S; Shimojo H; Akatsuka K; Nakata H; Maruyama A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142581. PubMed ID: 26600391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between eye and hand dominance and hitting, fielding and pitching skill among players of the Southern Baseball League.
Classe JG; Daum K; Semes L; Wisniewski J; Rutstein R; Alexander L; Beisel J; Mann K; Nawakowski R; Smith M; Bartolucci A
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Feb; 67(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9120206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptive profile of hip rotation range of motion in elite tennis players and professional baseball pitchers.
Ellenbecker TS; Ellenbecker GA; Roetert EP; Silva RT; Keuter G; Sperling F
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1371-6. PubMed ID: 17387220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the kinematics of the baseball swing between hitters of varying skill.
Inkster B; Murphy A; Bower R; Watsford M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jun; 43(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 21085044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.
Vallesi A; Stuss DT; McIntosh AR; Picton TW
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-dependent performance and handedness in professional baseball players (Homo sapiens).
Clotfelter ED
J Comp Psychol; 2008 Feb; 122(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 18298283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
Recio G; Schacht A; Sommer W
Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 19022336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of laser refractive surgery on the on-field performance of professional baseball players.
Laby DM; Kirschen DG; De Land P
Optometry; 2005 Nov; 76(11):647-52. PubMed ID: 16298317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanisms underpinning successful decision making in skilled youth soccer players: an analysis of visual search behaviors.
Vaeyens R; Lenoir M; Williams AM; Philippaerts RM
J Mot Behav; 2007 Sep; 39(5):395-408. PubMed ID: 17827116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
Jonkman LM
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal preparation in athletes: a comparison of tennis players and swimmers with sedentary controls.
Wang CH; Chang CC; Liang YM; Shih CM; Muggleton NG; Juan CH
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23405992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
