126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15654244)
1. Evaluation of lead equivalence of patient and hardware materials in medical diagnostic x-ray shielding.
Okunade AA
Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):S34-43. PubMed ID: 15654244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of shielding requirements for mammography.
Okunade AA; Ademoroti OA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1210-8. PubMed ID: 15191311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of lead attenuation and lead hardening equivalence of materials used in respect of diagnostic X-ray shielding.
Okunade AA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2002 Dec; 57(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 12406622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical models for the determination of primary structural barriers for diagnostic x-ray facilities.
Okunade AA
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):513-20. PubMed ID: 15070248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attenuation properties of diagnostic x-ray shielding materials.
Archer BR; Fewell TR; Conway BJ; Quinn PW
Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1499-507. PubMed ID: 7838062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of the influence of anode and filter materials on primary shielding requirements for mammography.
Okunade AA
Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):S44-52. PubMed ID: 15654245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the primary barrier in diagnostic x-ray shielding.
Dixon RL
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1785-93. PubMed ID: 7891641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equivalent thicknesses of beam hardening filters consisting of aluminium, copper, Al/Cu and Al/Gold combinations and plumbiferous acrylic for 40 to 150 kVp diagnostic spectra.
Homolka P; Figl M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1269-1283. PubMed ID: 30115815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the shielding effectiveness of lead aprons used in clinics for protection against ionising radiation from novel radioisotopes.
Deb P; Jamison R; Mong L; U P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):443-7. PubMed ID: 25848112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of shielding material properties for effective space radiation protection.
Naito M; Kodaira S; Ogawara R; Tobita K; Someya Y; Kusumoto T; Kusano H; Kitamura H; Koike M; Uchihori Y; Yamanaka M; Mikoshiba R; Endo T; Kiyono N; Hagiwara Y; Kodama H; Matsuo S; Takami Y; Sato T; Orimo SI
Life Sci Space Res (Amst); 2020 Aug; 26():69-76. PubMed ID: 32718689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Broad beam attenuation of kilovoltage photon beams: effect of ion chambers.
Das IJ
Br J Radiol; 1998 Jan; 71(841):68-73. PubMed ID: 9534701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shielding requirements for constant-potential diagnostic x-ray beams determined by a Monte Carlo calculation.
Simpkin DJ
Health Phys; 1989 Feb; 56(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 2917843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attenuation of Gamma Radiation Using ClearView Radiation ShieldingTM in Nuclear Power Plants, Hospitals and Radiopharmacies.
Bakshi J; Chu BP
Health Phys; 2020 Dec; 119(6):776-785. PubMed ID: 32897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New shielding materials for clinical electron beams.
Tajiri M; Tokiya Y; Uenishi J; Sunaoka M; Watanabe K
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):391-3. PubMed ID: 16959343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled x-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine.
Conway BJ; Duff JE; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ; Rothenberg LN; Fleischman RC
Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):448-53. PubMed ID: 2385202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
