These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1565433)

  • 1. Binocular accommodative facility testing reliability.
    Rouse MW; DeLand PN; Mozayani S; Smith JP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Apr; 69(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 1565433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monocular accommodative facility testing reliability.
    Rouse MW; Deland PN; Chous R; Determan TF
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Feb; 66(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 2710512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability.
    McKenzie KM; Kerr SR; Rouse MW; DeLand PN
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Mar; 64(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 3578484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reproducibility of accommodative facility measures in primary school children.
    Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):764-770. PubMed ID: 29740867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of gaming on accommodative and vergence facilities after exposure to virtual reality head-mounted display.
    Munsamy AJ; Paruk H; Gopichunder B; Luggya A; Majola T; Khulu S
    J Optom; 2020; 13(3):163-170. PubMed ID: 32234359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binocular vision anomalies and normative data (BAND) in Tamil Nadu: report 1.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 May; 100(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 27796049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction.
    García A; Cacho P; Lara F; Megías R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10829131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random Changes of Accommodation Stimuli: An Automated Extension of the Flippers Accommodative Facility Test.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; López S; Díaz-Doutón F; Vera-Díaz FA; Pujol J
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jun; 43(6):788-795. PubMed ID: 29488815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of computer-based and standard clinical accommodative facility testing methods.
    Rouse MW; Freestone GM; Weiner BA; De Land PN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Feb; 68(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 2027658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the Validity of a New Method for the Objective Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility (2Q-AF Test): A Comparison with ± 2.00 DS Lens Flippers.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Koulieris GA; Molina R; Jiménez R
    Curr Eye Res; 2022 Jan; 47(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34612106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The minimum test battery to screen for binocular vision anomalies: report 3 of the BAND study.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 29150866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binocular and Accommodative Characteristics in a Normal Population.
    Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M; Hashemi H; Ostadimoghaddam H; Ghasemi-Moghaddam S; Heravian J; Doostdar A; Nabovati P
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 28095087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of an Objective Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Molina R; Koulieris GA; Jiménez R
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 May; 45(5):636-644. PubMed ID: 31675903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency of convergence and accommodative disorders in a clinical population of Mashhad, Iran.
    Hoseini-Yazdi SH; Yekta A; Nouri H; Heravian J; Ostadimoghaddam H; Khabazkhoob M
    Strabismus; 2015; 23(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 25789965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part III. Masked assessment of the relation between visual symptoms and binocular test results in school children and adults.
    Wick B; Gall R; Yothers T
    Optometry; 2002 Mar; 73(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 12365701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA; Sobhani M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of vergence facility in a sample of older adults with presbyopia.
    Pellizzer S; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Nov; 75(11):817-21. PubMed ID: 9848836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of the test parameters in the clinical assessment of accommodative facility.
    Siderov J; Johnston AW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jul; 67(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 2402405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: Part 1. A critical appraisal of the literature.
    Wick B; Yothers TL; Jiang BC; Morse SE
    Optometry; 2002 Jan; 73(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 12363234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Sha J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jul; 45(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 30601291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.