BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15656468)

  • 1. The effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing compared with standard management of pressure ulcers.
    Kaya AZ; Turani N; Akyüz M
    J Wound Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 15656468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an advanced wound dressing used in Iran.
    Kordestani S; Shahrezaee M; Tahmasebi MN; Hajimahmodi H; Haji Ghasemali D; Abyaneh MS
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 18705234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
    Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Split-skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
    Mahmoud SM; Mohamed AA; Mahdi SE; Ahmed ME
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):303-6. PubMed ID: 18705232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating an optimum healing environment for a grade V pressure ulcer.
    Dobson JL; Ellis SL
    J Wound Care; 2001 Nov; 10(10):415-20. PubMed ID: 12964290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a silver-releasing hydroalginate dressing in chronic wounds with signs of local infection.
    Meaume S; Vallet D; Morere MN; Téot L
    J Wound Care; 2005 Oct; 14(9):411-9. PubMed ID: 16240620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in chronic wound management: the role of local povidone-iodine (Betadine) therapy.
    Daróczy J
    Dermatology; 2006; 212 Suppl 1():82-7. PubMed ID: 16490980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of a honey dressing for healing pressure ulcers.
    Yapucu Güneş U; Eşer I
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 17413836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of polyvinylidene film dressing for treatment of pressure ulcers in older people.
    Takahashi J; Yokota O; Fujisawa Y; Sasaki K; Ishizu H; Aoki T; Okawa M
    J Wound Care; 2006 Nov; 15(10):449-50, 452-4. PubMed ID: 17124819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
    Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
    Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
    Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic pressure wound therapy in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Thomas R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 19037138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of noncontact normothermic wound therapy on chronic full-thickness pressure ulcers.
    Kloth LC; Berman JE; Nett M; Papanek PE; Dumit-Minkel S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2002; 15(6):270-6. PubMed ID: 12477979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers.
    Shukrimi A; Sulaiman AR; Halim AY; Azril A
    Med J Malaysia; 2008 Mar; 63(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 18935732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
    Hermans MH
    Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.