139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15657447)
1. Mother Teresa versus Ebenezer Scrooge: mortality salience leads proselfs to endorse self-transcendent values (unless proselfs are reassured).
Joireman J; Duell B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Mar; 31(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 15657447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Injustice for all or just for me? Social value orientation predicts responses to own versus other's procedures.
van Prooijen JW; Ståhl T; Eek D; van Lange PA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1247-58. PubMed ID: 22700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments.
Anderson WD; Patterson ML
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 148(2):223-45. PubMed ID: 18512420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma.
Brucks WM; Van Lange PA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 17440204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What other's disappointment may do to selfish people: emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context.
Van Kleef GA; Van Lange PA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1084-95. PubMed ID: 18524971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bad for me or bad for us? Interpersonal orientations and the impact of losses on unethical behavior.
Reinders Folmer CP; De Cremer D
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jun; 38(6):760-71. PubMed ID: 22378831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.
Jonas E; Martens A; Kayser DN; Fritsche I; Sullivan D; Greenberg J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1239-51. PubMed ID: 19025281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense.
Fritsche I; Jonas E; Fankhänel T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 18729692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The self-protective altruist: terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior.
Hirschberger G; Ein-Dor T; Almakias S
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):666-78. PubMed ID: 18303130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma. An fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust.
Emonds G; Declerck CH; Boone C; Seurinck R; Achten R
Soc Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 9(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 24294906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: compensatory versus synergistic models.
Balliet D; Li NP; Joireman J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):1090-105. PubMed ID: 21875230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations.
van Dijk E; De Cremer D
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 16963606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of self-presentation on social value orientation.
Iedema J; Poppe M
J Soc Psychol; 1994 Dec; 134(6):771-82. PubMed ID: 7869705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes.
Eek D; Gärling T
Br J Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 45(Pt 2):321-37. PubMed ID: 16762104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformism moderates the relations between values, anticipated regret, and behavior.
Lönnqvist JE; Leikas S; Paunonen S; Nissinen V; Verkasalo M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1469-81. PubMed ID: 17030889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Representation of economic preferences in the structure and function of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.
Fermin AS; Sakagami M; Kiyonari T; Li Y; Matsumoto Y; Yamagishi T
Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20982. PubMed ID: 26876988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Not so ugly after all: when shame acts as a commitment device.
de Hooge IE; Breugelmans SM; Zeelenberg M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 95(4):933-43. PubMed ID: 18808269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The excluded player in coalition formation.
van Beest I; Wilke H; van Dijk E
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Feb; 29(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15272951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
