These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15658718)

  • 1. Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations.
    Goldsworthy RL; Greenberg JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3679-89. PubMed ID: 15658718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants.
    Strydom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):920-33. PubMed ID: 21361449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Novel Method for Intelligibility Assessment of Nonlinearly Processed Speech in Spaces Characterized by Long Reverberation Times.
    Kurowski A; Kotus J; Odya P; Kostek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T; Bolner F; Monaghan JJ; van Dijk B; Zarowski A; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
    Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.
    Bistafa SR; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):861-75. PubMed ID: 10687696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech encoding in the auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implants.
    Sachs MB; Young ED; Miller MI
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():94-113. PubMed ID: 6575675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.