140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15660065)
1. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems.
Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements?
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):67-72. PubMed ID: 1446456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of 2 proximally coated femoral stems: effects of stem length and surface finish.
Ong KL; Day JS; Manley MT; Kurtz SM; Geesink R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18977636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximal cemented femoral stems.
Cristofolini L; Baleani M; Toni A
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):464-5; author reply 465-7. PubMed ID: 16627161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Anatomic basis of the cemented femur shaft. A comparative study of straight and anatomic design].
Breusch SJ; Draenert Y; Draenert K
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 10036745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips.
Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
