These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

737 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15661300)

  • 1. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.
    Merrill DR; Bikson M; Jefferys JG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Feb; 141(2):171-98. PubMed ID: 15661300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation.
    Shannon RV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Apr; 39(4):424-6. PubMed ID: 1592409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical study of unipolar and bipolar configurations using high resolution single multi-walled carbon nanotube electrodes for electrophysiological probing of electrically excitable cells.
    de Asis ED; Leung J; Wood S; Nguyen CV
    Nanotechnology; 2010 Mar; 21(12):125101. PubMed ID: 20182008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes.
    Weiland JD; Anderson DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jul; 47(7):911-8. PubMed ID: 10916262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Offset prediction for charge-balanced stimulus waveforms.
    Woods VM; Triantis IF; Toumazou C
    J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046032. PubMed ID: 21753229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.
    Cogan SF
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2008; 10():275-309. PubMed ID: 18429704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microfabricated cylindrical multielectrodes for neural stimulation.
    Snow S; Jacobsen SC; Wells DL; Horch KW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 16485761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses.
    Rose TL; Robblee LS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Nov; 37(11):1118-20. PubMed ID: 2276759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part I: Bioimpedance measurement. First section: general concepts.
    Valentinuzzi ME
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(4-6):223-55. PubMed ID: 9196883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A voltage-controlled current source with regulated electrode bias-voltage for safe neural stimulation.
    Schuettler M; Franke M; Krueger TB; Stieglitz T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun; 171(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 18471890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface examination of electrodes of removed implants.
    Rozman J; Pihlar B; Strojnik P
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1988; 17():99-103. PubMed ID: 3261042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rational design of new electrodes for electrochemotherapy.
    Spugnini EP; Citro G; Porrello A
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Jun; 24(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 16110758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Richardson R; Huang CQ; Milojevic D; Cowan R; Shepherd R
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15876642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a 2-, 3- and 4-electrode stimulator design on current dispersion on the surface and into the limb during electrical stimulation in controls and patients with wounds.
    Petrofsky J; Lawson D; Prowse M; Suh HJ
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(6):485-97. PubMed ID: 19005963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How electrode size affects the electric potential distribution in cardiac tissue.
    Patel SG; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Sep; 47(9):1284-7. PubMed ID: 11008431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New currents in electrical stimulation of excitable tissues.
    Basser PJ; Roth BJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2000; 2():377-97. PubMed ID: 11701517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro measurement and characterization of current density profiles produced by non-recessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes.
    Suesserman MF; Spelman FA; Rubinstein JT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 May; 38(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 1874521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings.
    Keefer EW; Botterman BR; Romero MI; Rossi AF; Gross GW
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2008 Jul; 3(7):434-9. PubMed ID: 18654569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of consecutive slips in nerve signals recorded by implanted cuff electrode.
    Tong KY; Rong W; Li L; Cao J
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 May; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 17600750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated measurement of intestinal mucosa electrical parameters using a new digital clamp.
    Mathieu J; Mammar S; Eto B
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 30(8):591-8. PubMed ID: 19088943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.