BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15663583)

  • 1. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins].
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):17-22. PubMed ID: 15752661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
    Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
    Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
    BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction.
    Ware V; Raynor BD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study].
    Ancel J; Huissoud C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction.
    Yanik A; Gülümser C; Tosun M
    Adv Ther; 2007; 24(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 17901024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval.
    Rane SM; Pandis GK; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 12858301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
    Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.