These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15663712)

  • 1. Application of a propensity score approach for risk adjustment in profiling multiple physician groups on asthma care.
    Huang IC; Frangakis C; Dominici F; Diette GB; Wu AW
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):253-78. PubMed ID: 15663712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is risk-adjustor selection more important than statistical approach for provider profiling? Asthma as an example.
    Huang IC; Dominici F; Frangakis C; Diette GB; Damberg CL; Wu AW
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 15673579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in managing asthma: experience at the medical group level in California.
    Legorreta AP; Liu X; Zaher CA; Jatulis DE
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Apr; 6(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 10977452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations of physician group profiling indicators for asthma care.
    Huang IC; Diette GB; Dominici F; Frangakis C; Wu AW
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Jan; 11(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15697099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a matching algorithm to evaluate hospital coronary artery bypass grafting performance as an alternative to conventional risk adjustment.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 17496712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card.
    Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB
    Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a comparison of logistic versus hierarchical modeling.
    Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Bilimoria KY; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Dec; 209(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19959035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the physician's participatory style in asthma outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    Adams RJ; Smith BJ; Ruffin RE
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Mar; 86(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 11289322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Johnson ML; Bush RL; Collins TC; Lin PH; Liles DR; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Petersen LA
    Am J Surg; 2006 Sep; 192(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 16920428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of hierarchical models to evaluate performance of cardiac surgery centres in the Italian CABG outcome study.
    D'Errigo P; Tosti ME; Fusco D; Perucci CA; Seccareccia F;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():29. PubMed ID: 17608921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of instrumental variable analysis using a new instrument with risk adjustment methods to reduce confounding by indication.
    Fang G; Brooks JM; Chrischilles EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(11):1142-51. PubMed ID: 22510277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?
    Boss EF; Thompson RE
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1000-9. PubMed ID: 22461170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of the propensity score method: an exploratory comparison of proxy-completed to self-completed responses in the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey.
    Ellis BH; Bannister WM; Cox JK; Fowler BM; Shannon ED; Drachman D; Adams RW; Giordano LA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Sep; 1():47. PubMed ID: 14570594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses.
    Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
    Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2960-8. PubMed ID: 18071076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are performance measures based on automated medical records valid for physician/practice profiling of asthma care?
    Fuhlbrigge A; Carey VJ; Finkelstein JA; Lozano P; Inui TS; Weiss KB
    Med Care; 2008 Jun; 46(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 18520317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery.
    Merkow RP; Hall BL; Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Wang E; Chow WB; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 May; 214(5):822-30. PubMed ID: 22440055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of outcome quality control in intensive care medicine using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II].
    Schuster HP; Wilts S; Ritschel P
    Med Klin (Munich); 1996 Jun; 91(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 8767306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.