These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15663714)

  • 1. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?
    Gold JL; Dewa CS
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):291-307. PubMed ID: 15663714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies.
    Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C
    IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study.
    Vick CC; Finan KR; Kiefe C; Neumayer L; Hawn MT
    Am J Surg; 2005 Nov; 190(5):805-9. PubMed ID: 16226962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.
    Greene SM; Geiger AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):784-90. PubMed ID: 16828670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
    Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
    Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
    Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Institutional review board variability in minimal-risk multicenter urogynecology studies.
    Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Omotosho TB; Sanses T; Molden S; Hardy J; Brubaker L;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 22453318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research ethics board approval for an international thromboprophylaxis trial.
    Lutz K; Wilton K; Zytaruk N; Julien L; Hall R; Harvey J; Skrobik Y; Vlahakis N; Meade L; Matte A; Meade M; Burns K; Albert M; Cash BB; Vallance S; Klinger J; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D;
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22305662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.
    Kimberly MB; Hoehn KS; Feudtner C; Nelson RM; Schreiner M
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16651328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.
    Saginur R; Dent SF; Schwartz L; Heslegrave R; Stacey S; Manzo J
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(9):1479-82. PubMed ID: 18349399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Papp KK; Durning SJ
    Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 18520468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to institutional review boards.
    Sims JM
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2008; 27(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 18724181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
    McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.
    Marsolo K
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S77-81. PubMed ID: 22692264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sharing of lessons learned from multisite research.
    Fiss AL; McCoy SW; Bartlett DJ; Chiarello LA; Palisano RJ; Stoskopf B; Jeffries L; Yocum A; Wood A
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2010; 22(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 21068641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
    Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.