These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15665008)

  • 1. Single embryo transfer: a mini-review.
    Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 15665008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can cumulative pregnancy rates be increased by freezing and thawing single embryos?
    Prades M; Golmard JL; Vauthier D; Lefèbvre G; Poirot C
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 18295209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos.
    Ubaldi F; Rienzi L; Baroni E; Ferrero S; Iacobelli M; Minasi MG; Sapienza F; Martinez F; Anniballo R; Cobellis L; Tesarik J; Greco E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Jul; 115 Suppl 1():S106-9. PubMed ID: 15196727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective randomized study to assess the benefit of partial zona pellucida digestion before frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
    Sifer C; Sellami A; Poncelet C; Kulski P; Martin-Pont B; Bottero J; Porcher R; Cedrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2384-9. PubMed ID: 16772285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer.
    Hydén-Granskog C; Unkila-Kallio L; Halttunen M; Tiitinen A
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2935-8. PubMed ID: 15980000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?
    Mocanu EV; Cottell E; Waite K; Hennelly B; Collins C; Harrison RF
    Ir Med J; 2008 Jun; 101(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 18700513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome.
    Salumets A; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Karro H; Roos A; Tuuri T
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2368-74. PubMed ID: 16684837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cumulative delivery rate in an in vitro fertilization program with a single embryo transfer policy.
    Sundström P; Saldeen P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 19455443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [FIVNAT evaluation of frozen embryo transfers from 1987 to 1994].
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1996 Sep; 24(9):700-5. PubMed ID: 8998522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Kjellberg AT; Carlsson P; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 16172148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of pregnancies issued from frozen embryo transfers and pregnancies issued from fresh embryo transfers in fertilization in vitro. FIVNAT].
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1994 May; 22(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8032380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To transfer fresh or thawed embryos?
    Pinborg A
    Semin Reprod Med; 2012 Jun; 30(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 22585634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Triggering of final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin. Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles.
    Griesinger G; Kolibianakis EM; Papanikolaou EG; Diedrich K; Van Steirteghem A; Devroey P; Ejdrup Bredkjaer H; Humaidan P
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):616-21. PubMed ID: 17451691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study.
    Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles.
    Tang R; Catt J; Howlett D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 May; 21(5):1179-83. PubMed ID: 16410326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
    Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the major malformation rate of children conceived from cryopreserved embryos and fresh embryos.
    Li HZ; Qiao J; Chi HB; Chen XN; Liu P; Ma CH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(14):1893-7. PubMed ID: 20819574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the 'ideal' duration of progesterone supplementation before the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in estrogen/progesterone replacement protocols?
    Nawroth F; Ludwig M
    Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1127-34. PubMed ID: 15695314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.