These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15665232)

  • 1. A digital subtraction radiography scheme based on automatic multiresolution registration.
    Zacharaki EI; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Nikita KS; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):379-90. PubMed ID: 15665232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image registration based on lifting process: an application to digital subtraction radiography.
    Matsopoulos GK; Mouravliansky NA; Asvestas PA; Delibasis KK; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2006 Oct; 10(4):763-74. PubMed ID: 17044410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic noise robust registration of radiographs for subtraction using strategic local correlation: an application to radiographs of dental implants.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Lee SB; Huh KH
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Mar; 35(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15582631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An iterative point correspondence algorithm for automatic image registration: an application to dental subtraction radiography.
    Markaki VE; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jan; 93(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18760858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A contrast correction method for dental images based on histogram registration.
    Economopoulos TL; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):300-13. PubMed ID: 20587655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction.
    Lehmann TM; Hemler PF; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 12058267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Schmitt W; Spitzer K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):140-50. PubMed ID: 9693526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system.
    Benchimol D; Näsström K; Shi X
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 19700535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
    Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical imaging correction: a comparative study of five contrast and brightness matching methods.
    Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jun; 106(3):308-27. PubMed ID: 21496940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical efficacy of a new software developed for dental digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Gögüs S; Tuğsel Z; Ozturk A; Gungor C; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 17082332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.