These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. No breathing room in the anesthesia turf battle. Firshein J Hosp Health Netw; 1995 Jun; 69(12):48, 50, 52. PubMed ID: 7780458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The courts look at the exclusive contract for providing anesthesia services. Kucera WR AANA J; 1981 Apr; 49(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 7223347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Causes of action for tortious interference with business ruled triable by Georgia Appellate Court. Carroll Anesthesia Assocs., P.C. v. AnestheCare, Inc. Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Feb; 17(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11183058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sole area hospital may exclude nurse anesthetists in favor of physician anesthesiologists. BCB Anesthesia Care, Ltd. v. The Passavant Memorial Area Hospital Association. Margolis E Healthspan; 1994 Nov; 11(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 10184229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision. Reed TJ; Allen HS Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is physician refusal to deal with CRNAs (certified registered nurse anesthetists) an antitrust violation? Margolis RE Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):32. PubMed ID: 10107401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicians. Going to court for clout. Nordhaus-Bike AM Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(11):41-2. PubMed ID: 9189024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract against antitrust challenge in Hyde case. Tomaselli LA Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10265826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in antitrust/exclusive contract action. Tomaselli LA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Nov; 6(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10263299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme Court's Hyde decision: what is its significance? Waxman M; Enders RJ Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 10266389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Attack being mounted against court's 'antitrust' branding of M.D. contract. Nickles P; Tucker G; Brown M Mod Healthc; 1983 May; 13(5):162, 164, 166. PubMed ID: 10260311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Antitrust developments. Hospital exclusive contracts and the Department of Justice vertical restraints guidelines. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 10270265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital must abide by contractual agreement despite JCAH standards. Fraiche DD; Carlson WT Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):9-10. PubMed ID: 10289703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Enter exclusive contracts for right reasons. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(4):40. PubMed ID: 2914683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]