269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15666966)
21. The application of a recently isolated strain of Bacteroides (GB-124) to identify human sources of faecal pollution in a temperate river catchment.
Ebdon J; Muniesa M; Taylor H
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3683-90. PubMed ID: 17275065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis-infecting phages (enterophages) as markers of human fecal pollution in recreational waters.
Santiago-Rodríguez TM; Dávila C; González J; Bonilla N; Marcos P; Urdaneta M; Cadete M; Monteiro S; Santos R; Domingo JS; Toranzos GA
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4716-25. PubMed ID: 20723963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microbiological water quality along the Danube River: integrating data from two whole-river surveys and a transnational monitoring network.
Kirschner AK; Kavka GG; Velimirov B; Mach RL; Sommer R; Farnleitner AH
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3673-84. PubMed ID: 19552934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bifidobacterial survival in surface water and implications for microbial source tracking.
Ottoson JR
Can J Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19767833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection and source identification of faecal pollution in non-sewered catchment by means of host-specific molecular markers.
Ahmed W; Powell D; Goonetilleke A; Gardner T
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):579-86. PubMed ID: 18725724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between F-specific RNA phage genogroups, faecal pollution indicators and human adenoviruses in river water.
Ogorzaly L; Tissier A; Bertrand I; Maul A; Gantzer C
Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19121532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of mussels as biosamplers for characterization of faecal pollution in coastal recreational waters.
Roslev P; Bukh AS; Iversen L; Sønderbo H; Iversen N
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):586-93. PubMed ID: 20706005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of microbial source tracking methods in a Gulf of Mexico field setting.
Korajkic A; Badgley BD; Brownell MJ; Harwood VJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 107(5):1518-27. PubMed ID: 19457032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of faecal pollutants in Torrens and Patawalonga catchment waters in South Australia using faecal sterols.
Suprihatin I; Fallowfield H; Bentham R; Cromar N
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):283-9. PubMed ID: 12793691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating potential applications of faecal sterols in distinguishing sources of faecal contamination from mixed faecal samples.
Shah VG; Dunstan RH; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Von Nagy-Felsobuki E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3691-700. PubMed ID: 17614115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microbial source tracking: a forensic technique for microbial source identification?
Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Kay D; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Walters M; Gawler A; Hindle T
J Environ Monit; 2007 May; 9(5):427-39. PubMed ID: 17492088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Faecal sterols determination in wastewater and surface water.
Gilli G; Rovere R; Traversi D; Schilirò T; Pignata C
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2006 Oct; 843(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 16787764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of drinking water quality using indicator bacteria and bacteriophages.
Méndez J; Audicana A; Cancer M; Isern A; Llaneza J; Moreno B; Navarro M; Tarancón ML; Valero F; Ribas F; Jofre J; Lucena F
J Water Health; 2004 Sep; 2(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 15497816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of source tracking methods for application in spring water.
Wicki M; Auckenthaler A; Felleisen R; Karabulut F; Niederhauser I; Tanner M; Baumgartner A
J Water Health; 2015 Jun; 13(2):473-88. PubMed ID: 26042979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Population similarity analysis of indicator bacteria for source prediction of faecal pollution in a coastal lake.
Ahmed W; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A; Katouli M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Aug; 56(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 18561957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Water quality and microbiological status of the distribution system: traditional parameters and emerging parameters].
Scoglio ME; Grillo OC; Munaò F; Di Pietro A; Squeri L
Ann Ig; 1989; 1(5):1243-54. PubMed ID: 2483905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The emission potential of different land use patterns for the occurrence of coliphages in surface water.
Franke C; Rechenburg A; Baumanns S; Willkomm M; Christoffels E; Exner M; Kistemann T
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2009 May; 212(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 18804417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of bacteriophages for monitoring the microbiological quality of sewage sludge.
Mandilara G; Mavridou A; Lambiri M; Vatopoulos A; Rigas F
Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 16583821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microbial indicators and pathogens: removal, relationships and predictive capabilities in water reclamation facilities.
Costán-Longares A; Montemayor M; Payán A; Méndez J; Jofre J; Mujeriego R; Lucena F
Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4439-48. PubMed ID: 18762313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differential persistence of F-specific RNA phage subgroups hinders their use as single tracers for faecal source tracking in surface water.
Muniesa M; Payan A; Moce-Llivina L; Blanch AR; Jofre J
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1559-64. PubMed ID: 19147174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
