These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

752 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15667628)

  • 21. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of Different Restoration Techniques on Fracture Resistance of Root-filled Teeth: In Vitro Investigation.
    Hshad ME; Dalkılıç EE; Ozturk GC; Dogruer I; Koray F
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 29148912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
    Daneshkazemi AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Aug; 5(3):51-8. PubMed ID: 15318256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength and ultimate tensile strength of resin composite filled into dentine cavity; effect of bulk and incremental filling technique.
    Nayif MM; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 18276057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different posts on fracture strength of roots with vertical fracture and re-attached fragments.
    Ozcopur B; Akman S; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Aug; 37(8):615-23. PubMed ID: 20406354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using Resilon and Ribbond as root reinforcements--an in vitro study.
    Hemalatha H; Sandeep M; Kulkarni S; Yakub SS
    Dent Traumatol; 2009 Aug; 25(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 19519863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
    Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
    Steele A; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.