These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15667642)

  • 1. Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Feb; 8(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 15667642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency.
    da Silva Filho OG; Ferrari Júnior FM; Okada Ozawa T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 18416613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 16627179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midfacial and mandibular morphometry of children with Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):642-7. PubMed ID: 16102076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients.
    Wedrychowska-Szulc B; Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepień P
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 20018795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.
    Sayin MO; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 15264647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sagittal and vertical effects of transverse sagittal maxillary expander (TSME) in three different malocclusion groups.
    Maspero C; Galbiati G; Giannini L; Farronato G
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Apr; 16():6. PubMed ID: 25907431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions.
    Kuntz TR; Staley RN; Bigelow HF; Kremenak CR; Kohout FJ; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 18302456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.
    Alarashi M; Franchi L; Marinelli A; Defraia E
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12607851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental arch dimensions and tooth wear in two samples of children in the 1950s and 1990s.
    Camporesi M; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Defraia E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Dec; 207(12):E24. PubMed ID: 19876044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lip shape and position in Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    McIntyre GT; Millett DT
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 17029504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.
    Guyer EC; Ellis EE; McNamara JA; Behrents RG
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 3485393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.