These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15667761)

  • 1. Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on primary care.
    Jepson R; Weller D; Alexander F; Walker J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jan; 55(510):20-5. PubMed ID: 15667761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot on hospital diagnostic services.
    Price J; Campbell C; Sells J; Weller D; Campbell H; Kenicer M; Dunlop M
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2005 Sep; 27(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 15870100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Garvican L
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 9934649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK.
    Damery S; Clifford S; Wilson S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2010 Mar; 11():20. PubMed ID: 20214769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.
    UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):133. PubMed ID: 15237087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
    Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Would general practitioners support a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of faecal-occult blood testing?
    Tong S; Hughes K; Oldenburg B; Del Mar C
    Intern Med J; 2004; 34(9-10):532-8. PubMed ID: 15482265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the UK colorectal cancer screening pilot studies on incidence, stage distribution and mortality trends.
    McClements PL; Madurasinghe V; Thomson CS; Fraser CG; Carey FA; Steele RJ; Lawrence G; Brewster DH
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 36(4):e232-42. PubMed ID: 22425027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Avoiding inappropriate invitations to cancer screening programmes: the role of primary care.
    Campbell C; Anandan C; Appleton S; Elton R; Patnick J; Weller D
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 21536811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs.
    Woodrow C; Rozmovits L; Hewitson P; Rose P; Austoker J; Watson E
    BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 7():53. PubMed ID: 16981989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diabetes UK funded surveys of the structural provision of primary care diabetes services in the UK.
    Williams DR; Baxter HS; Airey CM; Ali S; Turner B
    Diabet Med; 2002 Jul; 19 Suppl 4():21-6. PubMed ID: 12121333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England.
    Weller D; Coleman D; Robertson R; Butler P; Melia J; Campbell C; Parker R; Patnick J; Moss S
    Br J Cancer; 2007 Dec; 97(12):1601-5. PubMed ID: 18026197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of population-based faecal occult blood test screening upon emergency colorectal cancer admissions in Coventry and north Warwickshire.
    Goodyear SJ; Leung E; Menon A; Pedamallu S; Williams N; Wong LS
    Gut; 2008 Feb; 57(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 18048571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring attitudes and practices of General Practice staff towards offers of opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a UK survey.
    Wallace L; McNulty C; Hogan A; Bayley J
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):255-68. PubMed ID: 22781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pilot study exploring the effect of discharging cancer survivors from hospital follow-up on the workload of general practitioners.
    Chait I; Glynne-Jones R; Thomas S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 May; 48(430):1241-3. PubMed ID: 9692283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inappropriate use of the faecal occult blood test outside of the National Health Service colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Peacock O; Watts ES; Hanna N; Kerr K; Goddard AF; Lund JN
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Nov; 24(11):1270-5. PubMed ID: 22872076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for colorectal cancer: a general-practice-based study.
    Marjoram J; Strachan R; Allan A; Allan E
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 May; 46(406):283-86. PubMed ID: 8762743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faecal occult blood screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practice in four Hong Kong primary care clinics.
    Tam TK; Ng KK; Lau CM; Lai TC; Lai WY; Tsang LC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Oct; 17(5):350-7. PubMed ID: 21979470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices.
    Carter M; Fletcher E; Sansom A; Warren FC; Campbell JL
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018688. PubMed ID: 29449293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the impact of a national pilot screening programme for type 2 diabetes in deprived areas of England.
    Goyder E; Wild S; Fischbacher C; Carlisle J; Peters J
    Fam Pract; 2008 Oct; 25(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18765406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.