BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15667814)

  • 1. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the whiplash injury criteria.
    Ivancic PC; Sha D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jan; 42(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19887145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the crash pulse shape on the peak loading and the injury tolerance levels of the neck in in vitro low-speed side-collisions.
    Kettler A; Fruth K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 16321634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 14630581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S187-93. PubMed ID: 22020611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.
    Croft AC; Philippens MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in vehicle and dummy responses in rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; Lawrence J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 16087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding whiplash injury and prevention mechanisms using a human model of the neck.
    Ivancic PC; Xiao M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1392-9. PubMed ID: 21545871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinetics of the head-neck complex in low-speed rear impact.
    Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():245-50. PubMed ID: 12724902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rate of change of acceleration: implications to head kinematics during rear-end impacts.
    Hynes LM; Dickey JP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in occupant response with seat belt slack and anchor location during moderate frontal impacts.
    Siegmund GP; Chimich DD; Heinrichs BE; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15823873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response?
    Mang DW; Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Blouin JS
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Aug; 113(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 22700800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of injury of the cervical spine in sled tests in female volunteers.
    Dehner C; Elbel M; Schick S; Walz F; Hell W; Kramer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jul; 22(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 17399873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concussion in professional football: biomechanics of the struck player--part 14.
    Viano DC; Casson IR; Pellman EJ
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):313-27; discussion 327-8. PubMed ID: 17762744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.
    Szabo TJ; Voss DP; Welcher JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 14630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.