These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15667814)

  • 21. A comparison of injury criteria used in evaluating seats for whiplash protection.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Huber P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2004 Mar; 5(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 14754676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests.
    Carlsson A; Linder A; Davidsson J; Hell W; Schick S; Svensson M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 21823943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic performances of different seat designs for low to medium velocity rear impact.
    Linder A; Olsson T; Truedsson N; Morris A; Fildes B; Sparke L
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2001; 45():187-201. PubMed ID: 12214349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anthropometric specifications, development, and evaluation of EvaRID--a 50th percentile female rear impact finite element dummy model.
    Carlsson A; Chang F; Lemmen P; Kullgren A; Schmitt KU; Linder A; Svensson MY
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):855-65. PubMed ID: 24484526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of seatback characteristics on cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts.
    Burnett R; Carter J; Roberts V; Myers B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Jul; 36(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 15094412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kinematic and electromyographic response to whiplash loading in low-velocity whiplash impacts--a review.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 May; 20(4):343-56. PubMed ID: 15737441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The repeatability and reproducibility of the BioRID IIg in a repeatable laboratory seat based on a production car seat.
    Hynd D; Depinet P; Lorenz B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S95-104. PubMed ID: 23905679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built.
    Zhang X; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26148123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What occupant kinematics and neuromuscular responses tell us about whiplash injury.
    Siegmund GP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S175-9. PubMed ID: 22020610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incorporation of lower neck shear forces to predict facet joint injury risk in low-speed automotive rear impacts.
    Stemper BD; Storvik SG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 20544575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Seat influences on female neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why women have higher whiplash rates.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):228-39. PubMed ID: 14522647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Energy-absorbing car seat designs for reducing whiplash.
    Himmetoglu S; Acar M; Bouazza-Marouf K; Taylor AJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Dec; 9(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 19058106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of anti-whiplash seats during low/moderate speed rear-end collisions.
    Mang DWH; Siegmund GP; Blouin JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 32027520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kinematics of head movement in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.
    Hernández IA; Fyfe KR; Heo G; Major PW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Dec; 20(10):1011-8. PubMed ID: 16168533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical spine curvature during simulated rear crashes with energy-absorbing seat.
    Ivancic PC; Xiao M
    Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 21377605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Whiplash injury prevention with active head restraint.
    Ivancic PC; Sha D; Panjabi MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Nov; 24(9):699-707. PubMed ID: 19666203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electromyographic and kinematic exploration of whiplash-type rear impacts: effect of left offset impact.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):656-65; discussion 666-8. PubMed ID: 15541698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC).
    Boström O; Fredriksson R; Håland Y; Jakobsson L; Krafft M; Lövsund P; Muser MH; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 10688488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alar, transverse, and apical ligament strain due to head-turned rear impact.
    Maak TG; Tominaga Y; Panjabi MM; Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 16540865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.